Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed Jan 29, 2025 at 10:52 AM GMT, songbird wrote:
>> Setting up openjdk-17-jre-headless:amd64 (17.0.14+7-1) ...
>> update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-21, but binary format
>> already installed by openjdk-9
>
> What do you have in /usr/share/binfmts ?
On Wed Jan 29, 2025 at 10:52 AM GMT, songbird wrote:
Setting up openjdk-17-jre-headless:amd64 (17.0.14+7-1) ...
update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-21, but binary format
already installed by openjdk-9
What do you have in /usr/share/binfmts ?
--
Please do not CC me for listmail
Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
...
> In my case these days, I have two things I would do to take a poke at
> this in hopes something obvious presents itself:
>
> $ apt-cache policy openjdk-9
>
> I might even try the much busier "apt-cache policy openjdk-*" to see if
> anything else is lingering. My setup
On 29/01/2025 17:52, songbird wrote:
update-binfmts: warning: current package is openjdk-21, but binary format
already installed by openjdk-9
Likely it is related to running of .jar files without explicit java
command. In a similar way wine may install a handler for .exe files in
addition to
On Wed, 2025-01-29 at 12:10 +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 05:52:34 -0500
> songbird wrote:
>
> Hello songbird,
>
> > warning: current package is openjdk-21, but binary format already
> > installed by openjdk-9
>
> I've seen similar messages. Certainly about openjdk, maybe oth
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 05:52:34 -0500
songbird wrote:
Hello songbird,
>warning: current package is openjdk-21, but binary format already
>installed by openjdk-9
I've seen similar messages. Certainly about openjdk, maybe others, I
can't recall. As everything seems to be working as expected, I don
6 matches
Mail list logo
