-> >Colin Watson wrote:
-> >-> That's very old, and doesn't seem to know about pools. The one I quoted
-> >-> is billed as a working pool-aware partial mirror script.
-> >
-> >well, pool is just subdirectory in the hierarchy, why should it work badly?
->
-> Because the packages that used to go in
"Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Colin Watson wrote:
>-> That's very old, and doesn't seem to know about pools. The one I quoted
>-> is billed as a working pool-aware partial mirror script.
>
>well, pool is just subdirectory in the hierarchy, why should it work badly?
Because
-> >-> >i using rsync mirror script d'l-ed from debian web page.
-> >->
-> >-> Which one?
-> >->
-> >-> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0011/msg01827.html
-> >
-> >http://www.debian.org/mirror/anonftpsync
->
-> That's very old, and doesn't seem to know about pools. The one I quoted
-> is
"Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-> >i using rsync mirror script d'l-ed from debian web page.
>->
>-> Which one?
>->
>-> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0011/msg01827.html
>
>http://www.debian.org/mirror/anonftpsync
That's very old, and doesn't seem to know about poo
-> >-> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dean Liversidge wrote:
-> >-> > Are the debian package trees being reorganised ?
-> >->
-> >-> Yes when new testing/unstable was introduced.
-> >->
-> >-> Mirror pool to get it working. I mirroed OK using fmirror. I posted
-> >-> script to do it
"Matus \"fantomas\" Uhlar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>-> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dean Liversidge wrote:
>-> > Are the debian package trees being reorganised ?
>->
>-> Yes when new testing/unstable was introduced.
>->
>-> Mirror pool to get it working. I mirroed OK using fmirro
-> On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dean Liversidge wrote:
-> > Are the debian package trees being reorganised ?
->
-> Yes when new testing/unstable was introduced.
->
-> Mirror pool to get it working. I mirroed OK using fmirror. I posted
-> script to do it within 24 hours. See archiv
Dean Liversidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 01 May 2001 16:32:57 +0100, you wrote:
>>It was announced months ago (November or so) on debian-devel-announce.
>>You might want to read that list if you're mirroring; it's pretty low
>>volume.
>
>I've only just noticed it, maybe its only just aff
On Tue, 01 May 2001 16:32:57 +0100, you wrote:
>Dean Liversidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[Package pools]
>
>>I couldnt find any reference to the changes on the debian site, i
>>would have expected a fundamental change like this to noticable,
>>especially as it affects stable
>
>It was announc
Dean Liversidge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Package pools]
>I couldnt find any reference to the changes on the debian site, i
>would have expected a fundamental change like this to noticable,
>especially as it affects stable
It was announced months ago (November or so) on debian-devel-announce.
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001 17:47:32 -0700, you wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dean Liversidge wrote:
>> Are the debian package trees being reorganised ?
>
>Yes when new testing/unstable was introduced.
>
>Mirror pool to get it working. I mirroed OK using fmirror. I posted
>script to
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:45:59PM +0100, Dean Liversidge wrote:
> Are the debian package trees being reorganised ?
Yes when new testing/unstable was introduced.
Mirror pool to get it working. I mirroed OK using fmirror. I posted
script to do it within 24 hours. See archive on web page.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
