Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-04 Thread John Foster
Wayne Topa wrote: > > Subject: Re: debian installation woes > Date: Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:59:08AM -0800 > > In reply to:aphro > > Quoting aphro([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > you can't boot a logical drive, it must be primary.. > > > > nate

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-04 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: debian installation woes Date: Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 10:59:08AM -0800 In reply to:aphro Quoting aphro([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > you can't boot a logical drive, it must be primary.. > > nate OH?? Gee, I wonder why my potato dist is working so well on h

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Matthew Dalton
Nick Phillips wrote: > > > > > you can't boot a logical drive, it must be primary.. > > > > IIRC, LILO should be able to boot from any partition, although it gets > a bit more complicated if the interesting bits aren't near enough to the > front of the disk... You *can* boot linux from a logic

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Mock Ko
--- Phil Brutsche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm probably just going to re-download the whole > thing > > and try again. > > Ewww - I would try to find a copy of Debian 2.1 (or > 2.0) at a local > 'Borders' bookstore - much more convenient. Believe me, I would if I could. Unfortunately I live

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Nick Phillips
> > you can't boot a logical drive, it must be primary.. > IIRC, LILO should be able to boot from any partition, although it gets a bit more complicated if the interesting bits aren't near enough to the front of the disk... I couldn't tell from the bits of previous posts I could see exactly how

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread aphro
you can't boot a logical drive, it must be primary.. nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Kenneth Scharf
I thought that might be the case. However anyone installing debian 2.1 would still be using the 2.0 kernel and have the 128mb limit. Anyway few people would need that much swap anyway. --- Brian Servis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > *- On 2 Nov, Kenneth Scharf wrote about &q

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 2 Nov, Kenneth Scharf wrote about "Re: debian installation woes" > 3: swap 127 megs (no swap may exceed 128mb, but you > can have more than one. Rummor has it that swap This 128M limit is no longer true in 2.2.x kernels. From the Changes file in the kernel source doc

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Kenneth Scharf
>1: w95 (1 gig) >2: extended (the rest of it) > 5: linux (1gig) > 6: vfat storage partition (2 gigs) > 7: vfat storage partition (the rest of it) > 8: linux swap (150 megs) There MAY be a problem with the boot sector crossing a 1024 cyl bound, not sure if scsi has this problem. Just to b

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Ethan Benson
On 2/11/99 Mock Ko wrote: 1: w95 (1 gig) 2: extended (the rest of it) ^ 5: linux (1gig) 6: vfat storage partition (2 gigs) 7: vfat storage partition (the rest of it) 8: linux swap (150 megs) I've gotten it to install and reboot off the mbr now (I was usin

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Phil Brutsche
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... [...] > Other hardware: > - realtek 8029 PCI ethernet card (the installer can't > find the module to install this card in the installer) This uses the pci-ne2k module. > - SB16 > - Riva TNT2 AGP > > I've gotten it to install and reboot

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread Mock Ko
Whoops! I knew I forgot something =) I'm running a celeron 300A system, 128MB ram, adaptec 2940UW, Seagate 9gig (scsi) partitioned as follows: 1: w95 (1 gig) 2: extended (the rest of it) 5: linux (1gig) 6: vfat storage partition (2 gigs) 7: vfat storage partition (the rest of it) 8: l

Re: debian installation woes

1999-11-02 Thread virtanen
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Mock Ko wrote: > I did the installation for debian, but it failed > miserably. > > It did the initial install, but it crashed every time > I rebooted, so I booted from the boot disk I created. Hi, I think that we need to know at least something about your hardware specificat