Noah Meyerhans wrote:
>
> I believe we could have released a version of Debian containing OpenSSH
> 2, Xfree86 4.x, and kernel 2.4.x by now had we decided that such a thing
> was important. It's important to me, as I'm sure it is to a good number
> of other Debian users and developers.
Agreed.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 12:34:30PM -0400, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
| On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 09:26:06PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
| > > Sure, stable is always well tested, but by the time it becomes available
| > > the software included in it is so old that nobody wants to run it
| > > anymore.
| >
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 09:26:06PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Sure, stable is always well tested, but by the time it becomes available
> > the software included in it is so old that nobody wants to run it
> > anymore.
>
> Well, almost. I run Potato on machines that I don't generally want to l
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Unfortunately, Debian has never been very good at keeping up with
> upstream development. They said that the "testing" distribution and
> package pools would help speed things up a bit, but it's not likely that
> woody will be released fewer than 18 months after potato.
>
On Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 03:59:56PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > I switched to Debian2.2r2 about eight months ago (at that time 2.2r2 was
> > the latest distribution). Recently, I've been unable to build almost
> > all the applications I have tried. The usual problem seems to be missing
> > f
on Sat, Sep 22, 2001 at 06:56:23PM -0500, sam rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I switched to Debian2.2r2 about eight months ago (at that time 2.2r2 was
> the latest distribution). Recently, I've been unable to build almost
> all the applications I have tried. The usual problem seems to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
