Thanks everyone for the kind support after long R&D and your tips help
me to went through the situation.
Thanks every one. :)
just FYI : i am using 320 GB HD for booting the system and 2TBx2
drives are just for RAID and backup the stuff
things are started well. Thanks God :)
Thank you all,
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:02:10 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>
>>> i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a
>>> centralized archiving server. moving forward e
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:08:10 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message
>> :
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
>>> wrote:
i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:20 PM, wrote:
>> De: "Muhammad Yousuf Khan"
>> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Mai 2012 14:08:10
>>> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
>>> wrote:
>>> > i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for m
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> yes i got that , but first i thought. it is related to something LVM
> over RAID. which means more complexity thats why i didn't read
> thoroughly ,
There isn't really much complexity to LVM over RAID. The RAID device
looks like any o
On Wed, 2012-05-09 at 15:20 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> yes i got that , but first i thought. it is related to something LVM
> over RAID. which means more complexity thats why i didn't read
> thoroughly ,
>
> thanks for the hit.
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darac Marjal wr
yes i got that , but first i thought. it is related to something LVM
over RAID. which means more complexity thats why i didn't read
thoroughly ,
thanks for the hit.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:15:43AM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>> ok
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:15:43AM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> ok i used the parted command by "mklabel gpt" i created the partition
> but i want it to be linux raid. please help me to convert it to raid
> since i can not find option in parted to make it a "fd" linux raid
> type nor i can
ok i used the parted command by "mklabel gpt" i created the partition
but i want it to be linux raid. please help me to convert it to raid
since i can not find option in parted to make it a "fd" linux raid
type nor i can find anything related to this topic on google. and
fdisk is not supporting the
On Tue, 08 May 2012 16:02:10 +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a
> centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but
> during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not
> change the "boot flag " to
> when i fdisk -l /dev/sda. like "Partition does not start on physical
> sector boundary" it happens when i create partition via installation
> CD. however when i create via fdisk via clonezilla CD and try to
Yes, had exactly the same error when I tried to make changes on
my partitions with gpar
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> cfdisk to 2tb Drive give me this
>
> Warning!! Unsupported GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected. Use GNU Parted.
>
> since things were not booting up with 2TB so i just installed 320 GB
> HD so that things start well however after insta
cfdisk to 2tb Drive give me this
Warning!! Unsupported GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected. Use GNU Parted.
since things were not booting up with 2TB so i just installed 320 GB
HD so that things start well however after installation and after
successful boot. when i cfdisk the primary partition
On Tue, 8 May 2012 17:08:10 +0500, Muhammad wrote in message
:
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan
> wrote:
> > i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a
> > centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well
> > but during the installation
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>>
>> i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a
>> centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but
>> during the installation in RAID creating i not
inal -
>> De: "Muhammad Yousuf Khan"
>> À: "debian"
>> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Mai 2012 14:08:10
>> Objet: Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
>>
>> ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the
>> partitions doesn&
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
> i just bought 2TBx2 Harddrives and a computer for making it a
> centralized archiving server. moving forward everything went well but
> during the installation in RAID creating i noticed that i could not
> change the "boot flag " to "
ginal -
> De: "Muhammad Yousuf Khan"
> À: "debian"
> Envoyé: Mardi 8 Mai 2012 14:08:10
> Objet: Re: debian 6.0.4 grub installation failed.
>
> ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the
> partitions doesn't reflect in installation
ok i fdisk the the partition via recovery CD clonezilla. but all the
partitions doesn't reflect in installation it is showing the old
partition structure however when i go to shell and check things via
FDISK it showed me the new created parttiion with boot flag on which i
have create via commandlin
19 matches
Mail list logo
