Unsubscribe info missing from digests [was: Re: Unsubscribing (Was: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086)]

2004-04-02 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 06:26:47PM -0500, CiAsA S'Nuey Boark wrote: > On Thursday April 01 2004 03:38 pm, Paul Johnson wrote: > > What was your point? DO NOT REPLY TO DIGESTS. If your MUA or MDA > > doesn't split digests, you SHOULD NOT USE DIGESTS. You posted a > > totally meaningless subject a

Unsubscribing (Was: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086)

2004-04-01 Thread CiAsA S'Nuey Boark
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday April 01 2004 03:38 pm, Paul Johnson wrote: > What was your point? DO NOT REPLY TO DIGESTS. If your MUA or MDA > doesn't split digests, you SHOULD NOT USE DIGESTS. You posted a > totally meaningless subject and a context-free line: *nobo

Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086

2004-04-01 Thread Pigeon
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 12:38:18PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > SheyZ SheyZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > well that went well. > > What was your point? DO NOT REPLY TO DIGESTS. If your MUA or MDA > doesn't split digests, you SHOULD NOT USE DIGESTS. You posted a > totally meaningless subject

Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086

2004-04-01 Thread Paul Johnson
SheyZ SheyZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > well that went well. What was your point? DO NOT REPLY TO DIGESTS. If your MUA or MDA doesn't split digests, you SHOULD NOT USE DIGESTS. You posted a totally meaningless subject and a context-free line: *nobody* knows what you're talking about. Get a

Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2004 #1086

2004-04-01 Thread SheyZ SheyZ
well that went well.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ATTACHMENT part 1 message/rfc822 debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2004 : Issue 1086Today's Topics:unsubscribe [ SheyZ SheyZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]> ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822 Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 10:38:31 -0800 (PST)From: SheyZ SheyZ <[EMAIL PROTE