On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> Because you used old fdisk (or new fdisk in dos mode), and it is paying
> attention to CHS information.
Thanks for the explanation, much appreciated.
> The world has changed, and left CHS crap behind, as well as the hacks
> fr
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011, trouble daemon wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, trouble daemon wrote:
> >> So it would seem that the installers guided partitions are creating
> >> broken partition tables that seem to mess with certain RAI
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, trouble daemon wrote:
>> So it would seem that the installers guided partitions are creating
>> broken partition tables that seem to mess with certain RAID
>
> No, it is creating perfectly fine LBA partition
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011, trouble daemon wrote:
> So it would seem that the installers guided partitions are creating
> broken partition tables that seem to mess with certain RAID
No, it is creating perfectly fine LBA partition tables that are aligned to
1MiB boundaries.
> controllers (google to get a
trouble daemon wrote:
> Anyways, the problem is that when I use the guided partitioning (tried
> with and without encrypted+lvm), `fdisk -l` makes mention of a bad
> partition table since sda1 isn't on a boundary.
The current wisdom of partitioning is changing. The debian-installer
is following t
Oops, almost forgot to mention that it was Debian Squeeze 6.0.2! Let
me know if you need any more info or tests etc. Cya \o
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:41 PM, trouble daemon wrote:
> Heya folks \o
>
> I am sending to the mailing list since I am not exactly sure about
> which package to file the bug
6 matches
Mail list logo
