Re: ddd's segfaulting tradition

1999-04-20 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 09:42:43 -0600, Gary L. Hennigan wrote: > Last time I looked there was even a Debian package for a statically > linked copy. "ddd-smotif", in the "contrib" section. Ray -- Obsig: developing a new sig

Re: ddd's segfaulting tradition

1999-04-20 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
"Noah L. Meyerhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: | > I wonder, does anyone use ddd in a serious way with C++? Everytime a | > new debian release arrives I give it a try, and everytime it manages to | > segfault within a few minutes. I suppose ddd sh

Re: ddd's segfaulting tradition

1999-04-20 Thread Noah L. Meyerhans
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 20 Apr 1999, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > I wonder, does anyone use ddd in a serious way with C++? Everytime a > new debian release arrives I give it a try, and everytime it manages to > segfault within a few minutes. I suppose ddd should be nice for C+

Re: ddd's segfaulting tradition

1999-04-20 Thread J.H.M. Dassen
On Tue, Apr 20, 1999 at 12:05:52 +0200, E.L. Meijer Eric" wrote: > I wonder, does anyone use ddd in a serious way with C++? Everytime a new > debian release arrives I give it a try, and everytime it manages to > segfault within a few minutes. I suppose ddd should be nice for C++ if it > worked, b