El 2012-08-05 a las 17:47 -0700, Fnzh Xx escribió:
(sending back to the list)
> On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:28:22 -0700, Fnzh Xx wrote:
>
> (please, no html posts, thanks)
>
> > root@debian:/home/tiger# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=10240k
> > 11447+1 records in
> > 11447+1 records out
> > 12003
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Fnzh Xx wrote:
>>
>> root@debian:/home/tiger# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=10240k
>> 11447+1 records in
>> 11447+1 records out
>> 120034123776 bytes (120 GB) copied, 4729.59 s, 25.4 MB/s
>> root@debian:/home/tiger# blkid
>> ...
>> why /dev/s
Am Montag, 6. August 2012 schrieb Bob Proulx:
> Fnzh Xx wrote:
> > root@debian:/home/tiger# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=10240k
> > 11447+1 records in
> > 11447+1 records out
> > 120034123776 bytes (120 GB) copied, 4729.59 s, 25.4 MB/s
> > root@debian:/home/tiger# blkid
> > ...
> > why /dev/sda
Fnzh Xx wrote:
> root@debian:/home/tiger# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=10240k
> 11447+1 records in
> 11447+1 records out
> 120034123776 bytes (120 GB) copied, 4729.59 s, 25.4 MB/s
> root@debian:/home/tiger# blkid
> ...
> why /dev/sda6 uuid don't equal /dev/sdb6 uuid?
I expect the kernel cached
On Sun, 05 Aug 2012 02:28:22 -0700, Fnzh Xx wrote:
(please, no html posts, thanks)
> root@debian:/home/tiger# dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/sdb bs=10240k
> 11447+1 records in
> 11447+1 records out
> 120034123776 bytes (120 GB) copied, 4729.59 s, 25.4 MB/s
> root@debian:/home/tiger# blkid
(...)
> /de
5 matches
Mail list logo