Re: csh [was: Using tar saving Disk-space]

2001-05-30 Thread Dave Carrigan
Joerg Johannes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is: this box is not my own, in fact, it is not even a debian > one (Sun Solaris) and, the worst of all: It only runs csh because the > admin does not like bash (I hate csh, too) Solaris boxes have ksh, which is a pretty solid shell. I like

Re: csh [was: Using tar saving Disk-space]

2001-05-30 Thread Roy Culley
> Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote: > > > How would this look for the csh? > > > > I'm going to assume you're just plain unaware of this: > > > > csh programming Considered Harmful > > > > Somebody can probably provide a link to a cop

Re: csh [was: Using tar saving Disk-space]

2001-05-30 Thread Joerg Johannes
Andrew Suffield wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote: > > How would this look for the csh? > > I'm going to assume you're just plain unaware of this: > > csh programming Considered Harmful > > Somebody can probably provide a link to a copy of the essay. csh

Re: csh [was: Using tar saving Disk-space]

2001-05-30 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:36:13AM +0200, Joerg Johannes wrote: > How would this look for the csh? I'm going to assume you're just plain unaware of this: csh programming Considered Harmful Somebody can probably provide a link to a copy of the essay. csh scripts are a majorly Bad Idea[tm]. It has