Re: confused by bug

2010-03-02 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:35:10PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > Contrast this with the "stable" version, which has migrated from > > stable-proposed-updates to stable. > > Sorted. After I realised you were talking about texlive-bin, while > texlive-latex-base is built from texlive-base, I read

Re: confused by bug

2010-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 21:30 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:17:11PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've been caught by (closed) bug #531595 > > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531595 ) > > > > It says it's closed, and fixed - and was i

Re: confused by bug

2010-03-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 05:48:49PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > > You should be able to grab the fixed package from the > > oldstable-proposed-updates section of the archive. > > Thanks Kumar. > > I added: > deb http://ftp.nz.debian.org/debian oldstable-proposed-updates main > to my sources.lis

Re: confused by bug

2010-03-01 Thread Richard Hector
On Mon, 2010-03-01 at 21:30 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > The bug has been fixed in 2005.dfsg.2-13, which was uploaded to > oldstable-proposed-updates. Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to have > made it's way into oldstable, as is revealed here: > > [ku...@bluemoon ~] rmadison texlive-bin > texli

Re: confused by bug

2010-03-01 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 04:17:11PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been caught by (closed) bug #531595 > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=531595 ) > > It says it's closed, and fixed - and was important to fix in etch, since > that's where the problem is/was. > >