Re: configuration management

2011-05-06 Thread shawn wilson
thanks for the replies. replying to Karl's message so that it goes into the list archive. so, my thoughts so far: wikipedia needs updating on this front. cdist looks pretty simple - i think i could have it up for what i'm using in a matter of minutes. cfengine looks pretty old school and it probab

Re: configuration management

2011-05-06 Thread Tom Grace
On 07/05/11 00:56, shawn wilson wrote: i'd prefer the system have some sort of ajax, soap, xml, syslog, or snmp v3 output (in order of preference - can ya tell how i feel about snmp?). but, i suppose i can parse and spit out pretty much any output if need be. What information are you looking to

Re: configuration management

2011-05-06 Thread Brad Alexander
I have used cfengine2 and cfengine3, and I am currently learning puppet. These are roughly equivalent functionalities, with cfengine being the grandfather of all of them (circa 1993, iirc). One thing I have found is your programming preferences could help make the decision for you. cfengine is vagu

Re: Configuration management

2000-03-08 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Christian Lynbech on satellite wrote: > I have been toying with the same idea (putting stuf like /etc) under > CVS control, though I haven't gotten round to become serious about it > yet. > > My idea towards handling individual machine specifics would be to use > the branch sy

Re: Configuration management

2000-03-08 Thread Christian Lynbech on satellite
I have been toying with the same idea (putting stuf like /etc) under CVS control, though I haven't gotten round to become serious about it yet. My idea towards handling individual machine specifics would be to use the branch system. If a certain file needed a specific change, branch off (on that f

Re: Configuration management

2000-03-07 Thread Brian Bartholomew
[I am not on this mailing list. Please cc: me in replies.] > * CVS (the remote protocol) doesn't track file permissions, >ownership and symbolic links. In ftp://ftp.pn.com/pub/bb/cvsmapfs you'll find a workaround: # Purpose: # # It would be extremely useful to store an entire UNIX u

Re: Configuration management

2000-03-07 Thread Olaf Meeuwissen
Hi Jean Pierre, Thanks for your follow-up. Looks like you've stumbled across the same limitations I have. You probably know that PreservePermissions could be of some help with permissions, ownerships and symlinks and that it does not work in a client/server set up :-( But there's another thing

Re: Configuration management

2000-03-01 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On 28 Feb 2000, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote: > However, I'm not really happy with this way of doing things. I'd like > to hear about some other ways. I've toyed with the idea of using CVS, > archiving /etc and making a local package. Slightly related, I'm also > looking for ways to quickly clone a sy