Re: complete vs. detached GPG signatures

2004-01-16 Thread Pigeon
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:17:30AM -0700, Rob Sims wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2004 01:41 pm, Pigeon wrote: > ... > > "Make a signature": > > original-file.txt, 13021 bytes > > -- signing process --> > > original-file.txt + separate signature file, length 5105 bytes, named >

Re: complete vs. detached GPG signatures

2004-01-16 Thread Rob Sims
On Wednesday 14 January 2004 01:41 pm, Pigeon wrote: ... > It doesn't specifically list an option to "make a complete signature". I had > assumed that gpg -s was the "complete signature" option as the other options > call themselves something different. I may be wrong here. The results I get, > sig

Re: complete vs. detached GPG signatures

2004-01-14 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:53:18PM +0100, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 22:21:43 +, Pigeon wrote: > > Anyone care to explain, or point me to an explanation of, the difference > > between a "complete" and "detached" GPG signature? > > Complete signature: > original

Re: complete vs. detached GPG signatures

2004-01-14 Thread J.H.M. Dassen (Ray)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 22:21:43 +, Pigeon wrote: > Anyone care to explain, or point me to an explanation of, the difference > between a "complete" and "detached" GPG signature? Complete signature: original file -- signing process --> modified file containing both the