Moritz Schulte wrote:
> > There are a few other chages required depending on arhcitecture / what
> > drivers you are compiling so I would get the latest patch from testing
> > (6, which I'm just about to compile - hopefully it has repaired the
> > parport_pc problem that the last few have had, alt
Mike Garfias wrote:
>
> Ok, its been too damned long since I've had to apply patches to anything.
> Can you tell me the way the directories need to look in order to apply > >
> the patch
OK assuming your kernel source is in /usr/src/linux, dump the file e.g.
test4-pre6.gz into /usr/src/linux and
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 07:56:25PM +0100, Jonathan Heaney wrote:
> Moritz, the patch has subsequently been corrected - you can use the
> updates in pub/linux/kernel/testing to get the latest patch. I've
> amended the relevant section below.
[...]
> wrong way round, it's now >
[...]
thnx for
Ok, its been too damned long since I've had to apply patches to anything.
Can you tell me the way the directories need to look in order to apply the
patch? Umm, as well as the command needed to apply the patch.
Jeez, I feel like a gimp
Jonathan Heaney spoke forth with the blessed manuscript:
> M
Moritz, the patch has subsequently been corrected - you can use the
updates in pub/linux/kernel/testing to get the latest patch. I've
amended the relevant section below.
>use the following patch:
>
> --- linux/kernel/timer.c.orig Thu Jul 13 15:51:31 2000
> +++ linux/kernel/timer.cThu J
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 10:24:55AM -0300, Mario Olimpio de Menezes
wrote:
> I'm trying to compile 2.4.0-test3 on potato unsuccessfully!
it's a kernel problem..
[...]
> timer.c: In function `update_process_times':
> timer.c:580: structure has no member named `priority'
> timer.c:580: `DEF_P
6 matches
Mail list logo
