Mladen Adamovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You probably have AnyMeal related problem so the better idea is to use
> anymeal mailing list or forums.
> Most probably you are using different version of Xalan-C then the
> AnyMeal's authors.
I was guessing something like that. The thing that confu
Matthias Julius wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to build AnyMeal (http://anymeal.sourceforge.net). When
running make I get following error:
You probably have AnyMeal related problem so the better idea is to use
anymeal mailing list or forums.
Most probably you are using different version of Xalan-C
I guess it would be the binutils package... Search for the package when you run base-config, to find out.
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote:> Dear Debian Community,> > I just installed Debian 3.0.0r0 from the set of 7 cd's and I a
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 10:20:30PM +0100, Christian Fuchs wrote:
> Dear Debian Community,
>
> I just installed Debian 3.0.0r0 from the set of 7 cd's and I am very
> excited about it
> (and a new user to debian).
>
> I have, however a problem compiling any kind of C - Files.
>
> I first tried co
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 10:23:28PM -0400, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured l
On Sun, 14 Apr 2002 12:23, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured lilo and everyth
On Sat, 2002-04-13 at 22:23, Vivek Bharathan wrote:
> Hello, I recently reformatted my hard drive and upgraded from potato to
> woody. Previously, under potato, when I upgraded and recompiled my
> kernel, I simply set the config file, typed make dep, and make install
> and configured lilo and every
Oleg Krivosheev wrote:
> nope, it will be released about Sep 1st and based on gcc 2.7.2.3
That's good news. Unfortunately, if it's based on 2.7.2.3, that means
there probably won't be a libc5 version of it. If that's going to
inconvenience anybody, let me know, and I'll...see what I can do.
--
Galen Hazelwood wrote:
>Thus Spake Michael Taeschner:
>>Awaiting g77 0.5.21 soon,
>Don't hold your breath. I've heard that it's been indefinitely delayed,
>sort of like gcc 2.8.
Craig Burley is planning the release of g77 0.5.21 on September 1st,
or at least so he wrote two days ago.
--
Thomas
Hi,
On Thu, 21 Aug 1997, Galen Hazelwood wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 12:01:44 -0600
> From: Galen Hazelwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.DEBIAN.org
> Subject: G77 (was Re: compilation problems)
> Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 1997 18:04:20 +
>
Thus Spake Michael Taeschner:
>Did you try to install GNU fortran77, the real f77 compiler?
>BTW it comes in version 0.5.20 in stable (though 5.20 is known to have
>bugs), maybe somewhere 0.5.19.1 is somewhere around as .deb?
The bo-updates section has 0.5.19.1.
>Awaiting g77 0.5.21 soon,
Don
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
>Hi,
>
>I apologize for the long message but I figure I'd better lay out all the
>errors. I'm having some unusual compilation problems on a new machine I'm
>setting up. When I try a make depend on some code, I often get one or more
>of the follow
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Jesse Goldman wrote:
> ii netbase 2.13-1 Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
> ii netstd 2.13-1 Networking binaries and daemons for
> ii f77reorder 2.25-2 f77 compiler script calling f2c/gcc.
> ii sed 2.05-12T
13 matches
Mail list logo
