Dear Jason:
Did you attend Riverside City College in the early 80’s?
Sincerely,
Tim Teffeteller
Matco Components, Inc.
949-951-4626
949-951-4610 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.matcocomponents.com
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:20:05PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 02:28:14AM -0800 or thereabouts, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:33:49AM -0700, Jeremiah Hunter Savage wrote:
> > > How do I get 'ls' to display color like xterm in the console (no X)?
> > > i.
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 02:28:14AM -0800 or thereabouts, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:33:49AM -0700, Jeremiah Hunter Savage wrote:
> > How do I get 'ls' to display color like xterm in the console (no X)?
> > i.e. directories=blue, executables=green, links=light blue,
> > devic
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 12:33:49AM -0700, Jeremiah Hunter Savage wrote:
> How do I get 'ls' to display color like xterm in the console (no X)?
> i.e. directories=blue, executables=green, links=light blue,
> devices=yellow. I am using the frame buffer.
add the following to your ~/.bashrc:
eval `
On Sat, 3 Oct 1998, D'jinnie wrote:
> Where is the color file for the color option of ls? In slackware it's
> /etc/DIRCOLORS but I can't seem to locate it on debian :(
Maybe you are looking for this:
dircolors --print-database
[ Complete details in info format ].
On: Sat, 3 Oct 1998 22:37:01 -0500 (CDT) D'jinnie writes:
> Also - since logs get rotated every night, how can I change the
> group and permissions (group readable) for all log files? I would
> like to be able to view/edit them from my user account instead of
> root...
Add your user to the group
Hi,
Just an idea! Should 'ls --color' be compiled as default? I believe
we all have color monitor
Richard L. Alhama wrote:
>
> On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > Try
> > 'ls --color'
> > If it works, set the alias ls='ls --color '.
> woohoo! It worked
>
> > by
On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, Richard L. Alhama wrote:
> How do I use color-ls?
man ls :)
ls --color=tty
ls --color=auto
I use =tty out of preference. just set the alias in you .bash_profil or in
/etc/profile
Nikolai
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
On Fri, 17 Jul 1998, Richard L. Alhama wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Andreas Mueller wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > Try
> > 'ls --color'
> > If it works, set the alias ls='ls --color '.
> woohoo! It worked
>
> > by
> > -am
> >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/nu
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hi
> Try
> 'ls --color'
> If it works, set the alias ls='ls --color '.
woohoo! It worked
> by
> -am
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
>
>
Thanks a lot
/\ Richard L. Alhama, Technical S
Hi
Try
'ls --color'
If it works, set the alias ls='ls --color '.
by
-am
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
Hugo HAAS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, Chris R. Martin wrote:
>
> > I can't seem to find the color-ls package. Has it been replaced by
> > something else?
>
> ls includes now the option color :
>
>--color, --colour, --color=always, --colour=always
>
Yes try the fileutils_3.13-4.deb package which replaces color-ls :) tho i
can not seem to get it to do any background colors, only some of the
foreground.
-Rob
On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, Chris R. Martin wrote:
>
> I can't seem to find the color-ls package. Has it been replaced by
> something else?
On Fri, 13 Dec 1996, Chris R. Martin wrote:
> I can't seem to find the color-ls package. Has it been replaced by
> something else?
ls includes now the option color :
--color, --colour, --color=always, --colour=always
Colorize the names of files depending on the type
> I can't seem to find the color-ls package. Has it been replaced by
> something else?
No more color-ls. It is now part of fileutils, a base package, so it is
already installed. Add few aliases to /etc/csh.login for the miracle
to happen (for more info, see /usr/doc/fileutils/color-ls.gz):
[FAQ]
Before fileutils 3.13, you need the color-ls package, and then
you just need eval `dircolors`.
After fileutils-3.13:
With the integration of color-ls directly into the fileutils
package, a few things have changed. dircolors no longer sets
up aliases or shell scripts to colorize ls, dir,
We use the following and it seems to work...
eval `dircolors -b`
either in the /etc/profile (global) or the
the individual user's profile works as well.
At 12:40 PM 10/25/96 PDT, you wrote:
>To get color ls, use the command
>
> alias ls="ls --color=auto"
>
>That's for "sh" and "bash". If
Those of you who have fileutils 3.13, read
/usr/doc/fileutils/color-ls.gz for the answers to all your questions.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> To get color ls, use the command
>
> alias ls="ls --color=auto"
>
> That's for "sh" and "bash". If you use "csh" or "tcsh" use
>
> alias ls "ls --color=auto"
>
> - Bruce
Guess what.. when I do this, and then type ls, I get Segmentation F
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> To get color ls, use the command
>
> alias ls="ls --color=auto"
>
> That's for "sh" and "bash". If you use "csh" or "tcsh" use
>
> alias ls "ls --color=auto"
You can just put:
eval `dircolors`
in your startup script .profile, .tcshrc,
At 2:40 PM -0500 10/25/96, Bruce Perens wrote:
>To get color ls, use the command
>
> alias ls="ls --color=auto"
>
>That's for "sh" and "bash". If you use "csh" or "tcsh" use
>
> alias ls "ls --color=auto"
>
>- Bruce
I've been wondering how to do this, too... So I tried it, and it does
From: "Jason K. Keimig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You can just put:
> eval `dircolors`
> in your startup script .profile, .tcshrc, .login or whatever... it sets
> the color-ls environment appropriately for whatever shell you use.
Are you sure, or am I doing something wrong? Dircolors doesn't tur
On Fri, 25 Oct 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> > You can just put:
> > eval `dircolors`
> > in your startup script .profile, .tcshrc, .login or whatever... it sets
> > the color-ls environment appropriately for whatever shell you use.
>
> Are you sure, or am I doing something wrong? Dircolors d
On Wed, 31 Jul 1996, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something has happened to stop ls giving color output. I used to be
> able to just run:
>
> eval `dircolors`
>
> and ls would work in color - even without specifying the "--color"
> option. (And no, ls was not aliased)
>
> Now it seems I
> Shouldn't it both conflict and replace color-ls, so that color-ls gets
> completely overwritten when the new fileutils it replaced? Otherwise stuff
> like /usr/doc/copyright/color-ls (for instance) won't get removed... And
> dpkg -l will still show a color-ls package.
done in 3.13-3
Erick
> hmm ok well i have checked 5 sites now and fileutils-3.12-4.deb IS the
> newer version. if i am wrong about this please tell where there is a newer
> version.
Check unstable for 3.13-3, if not found try a few days later.
Erick
Robert> hmm ok well i have checked 5 sites now and fileutils-3.12-4.deb IS
Robert> the newer version. if i am wrong about this please tell where there
Robert> is a newer version.
You have to look in the "rex" aka "development" aka "unstable" tree, not in
"Debian-1.1-fixed" aka "Debian-1.1.3
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert> same here. i installed fileutils-3.12-4. the color-ls package still
> Robert> remains and wasn't removed
> Dirk> Sure, 3.12-4 is not 3.13-{1,2}. Try a newer version of fileutils.
> Michael> Sorry Dirk but
>
> I never said that _you_ we
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> 147) dpkg -s fileutils
> Package: fileutils
> Essential: yes
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: required
> Section: base
> Maintainer: Erick Branderhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Version: 3.13-2
> ^^
> Replaces: color-ls
> Pre-Depends:
Robert> same here. i installed fileutils-3.12-4. the color-ls package still
^^
Robert> remains and wasn't removed
Dirk> Sure, 3.12-4 is not 3.13-{1,2}. Try a newer version of fileutils.
Michael> Sorry Dirk but
I never said that _you_ were
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Robert> same here. i installed fileutils-3.12-4. the color-ls package still
> ^^
> Robert> remains and wasn't removed
>
> Sure, 3.12-4 is not 3.13-{1,2}. Try a newer version of fileutils.
Sorry Dirk but
147) dpkg -s fil
Wichert Akkerman writes:
> > I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder why the
> > old one isn't removed automatically? Is there a reason for this?
>
> Some monitors make text unreadable (cheap laptops for example) when you use
> colors. Maybe a postinst-script could ask if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Michael> I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder
> Michael> why the old one isn't removed automatically? Is there a reason for
> Michael> this?
>
> color-ls was removed here when I installed fileutils-3.13-1.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> dp
> I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder why the
> old one isn't removed automatically? Is there a reason for this?
Some monitors make text unreadable (cheap laptops for example) when you use
colors. Maybe a postinst-script could ask if color-ls should be the new
defaul
Dirk> Oh yes, it was aliased to do that. Just start the dircolors (the old
Dirk> one from the color-ls package, that is) from the shell and you'll
Dirk> see.
Michael> I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder
Michael> why the old one isn't removed automatically?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Erick, is there a way that you can persuade/hack dircolors to do what the old
> one did? Or put a note in the package to ease transition?
Not only that. Shouldn't we add /etc/DIR_COLORS into fileutils?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes |_ _
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Oh yes, it was aliased to do that. Just start the dircolors (the old one from
> the color-ls package, that is) from the shell and you'll see.
I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder why the
old one isn't removed automatically? Is there a reason
On Thu, 1 Aug 1996, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > color-ls was removed here when I installed fileutils-3.13-1.
>
> Strange. On my site it wasn't.
>
> Michael
>
same here. i installed fileutils-3.12-4. the color-ls package still
remains and wasn't removed
/--
I will add that `--color' is equivalent to `--color=yes', which is
probably not what you want. If you make any aliases, use
`--color=tty'. You don't want nasty escape codes if it's not a tty.
Try `ls --color | less' to see what I mean.
And fileutils does have a bug with regards to color-ls. It
I have the same problem. I to have upgraded some packages, but I can't
remember which ones. I will try to look at my list and try to remember
which ones I did just before I noticed it.
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
>Something has happened to stop ls giving color output. I used
Michael> I like to see that the standard ls is now colorized. But I wonder
Michael> why the old one isn't removed automatically? Is there a reason for
Michael> this?
Wichert> Some monitors make text unreadable (cheap laptops for example)
Wichert> when you use colors. Maybe a postinst-s
Guy> I will add that `--color' is equivalent to `--color=yes', which is
Guy> probably not what you want. If you make any aliases, use
Guy> `--color=tty'. You don't want nasty escape codes if it's not a tty.
Those are the old style options implemented by color-ls (which is a patched
versi
Dirk> > color-ls was removed here when I installed fileutils-3.13-1.
^^
Michael> Strange. On my site it wasn't.
Robert> same here. i installed fileutils-3.12-4. the color-ls package still
43 matches
Mail list logo
