[solved] - sortof
After some googling and experimentation, I installed keyutils, and the
mount command now seems to work. Should cifs-utils depend on keyutils?
-Chris
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:01 PM Christopher Judd
wrote:
> The share is on a Windows server, NTFS filesystem using DFS.
>
> -Chr
The share is on a Windows server, NTFS filesystem using DFS.
-Chris
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 11:49 AM Christopher Judd
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a samba share here of the form . I
> used to be able to mount this, but in no longer works, When I try, I get
> this result:
>
> $mount.cifs //xxx/y
Hi Chris,
Quick question: is the target that you are trying to mount from a Windows
box, or a Linux box? Just wondering if its an SMB version problem.
Cheers!
Paul.
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 16:50, Christopher Judd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a samba share here of the form . I
> used to be able
On 12/03/2013 05:22 AM, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Still waiting for help, if possible.
You might want to try the Samba mailing list:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
HTH,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Pierre Frenkiel wrote:
Password:
Password for root@//wehd/hdd:
Please note the difference for the 2 paswword requests. I suppose that this
can help to explain the difference of behaviour between the 2 nachines.
forget this: it's just becaus the cifs-utils versions a
On 26/11/13 21:38, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> That mouse thing moves the cursor ;)
>>
>
> I am sorry...I am not really used to this kind of mailing list
> conversation
No worries.
>
>
>>>
How does "$ testparm -v" on the new box compare with the same from the
box that did
Hi,
>
> This is why some (me) people dislike top posters and prefer to ignore
> them over posters who make the effort to interleave their replies. Not
> only does it require extra work to read the post and put it into context
> - it 'seems' to also encourages posters to *not* read what they are
>
Since the 3.x kernels there is a problem with samba. In my work
environment I have to revert to a 2.6 kernel to be able to mount a Windows
share.
Here is a reply on my question I have asked in a cifs-related list in
February this year:
"The user you're connecting as doesn't have access to do a l
This is why some (me) people dislike top posters and prefer to ignore
them over posters who make the effort to interleave their replies. Not
only does it require extra work to read the post and put it into context
- it 'seems' to also encourages posters to *not* read what they are
replying to. I c
Hi,
so I did some testing with a clone of the machine restored to the
state before the upgrade to wheezy.
Squeeze:
- Mount the share
- Disable the share on windows host
- Try to access the share with 'ls' results in 'no such device'
- Enable the share on windows host
- Try to access the share wit
On 21/11/13 22:39, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried your tricks, removing auto, adding _netdev but the problem
> still exists. I seems to happen when I am not working on the share for
> a certain amount of time. The share seems to be lost thenthis did
> not happen under wheezy. So I
Hi,
I tried your tricks, removing auto, adding _netdev but the problem
still exists. I seems to happen when I am not working on the share for
a certain amount of time. The share seems to be lost thenthis did
not happen under wheezy. So I am thinking about, what kind of code to
blame? mount.cif
On 19/11/13 23:33, assm...@skygate.de wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> since my upgrade to wheezy I have a problem with a cifs mount. It is a
> share of my windows host. The setup worked fine in debian squeeze.
>
> I mount this in a virtualbox guest via /etc/fstab like this:
>
> //myipadress/data /data c
On Thu, 16 Aug 2012 18:30:37 +1000, Robert S wrote:
> I have a debian machine called "debian" and a windows XP machine called
> "server". I have a permanent mounted read-only share called
> \\server\doc. My /etc/fstab looks like this:
>
> //server/doc/opt/chroot/mnt/server cifs
> credentia
On 16/08/12 04:30 AM, Robert S wrote:
I have a debian machine called "debian" and a windows XP machine
called "server". I have a permanent mounted read-only share called
\\server\doc. My /etc/fstab looks like this:
//server/doc/opt/chroot/mnt/server cifs
credentials=/root/.smbmount,userna
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:51:05 -0200, Renato S. Yamane wrote:
> [Please, let me in cc because I´m not subscribed on this mailing list]
Done.
> Since last week I can´t access the Windows shares anymore.
>
> I´m using Debian Squeeze and smb4k 0.10.7 (I already try mount it with
> command line, but
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 12:01:31 +1000, Robert S wrote:
> I have several mounted CIFS shares to a Win XP Pro server. This
> usually functions well for a few days/hours then I get input/output
> errors. When I unmount them and try to reconnect I get:
>
> # mount -a -t cifs
> mount error 5 = Input
17 matches
Mail list logo
