On Thu, 30 May 2002 19:25:11 -0500
"Jamin W. Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can provide the IP range of the remote location it's just a
> matter of putting an entry in your routing tables for it.
UGH! Really does help if one make sure they read all of a post. I totally
missed the f
On Fri, 31 May 2002 07:59:46 +0800
"No Realm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the poor diagram. If I remove my gateway for the eth0, I will
> not be able to reach my network on the other side of the .60 router. I
> am using my Debian box as a backup mail server that passes all mail to a
> m
On Fri, 31 May 2002 05:01:48 +0800
"No Realm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.60.31
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> broadcast 192.168.60.255
> gateway 192.168.60.1
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet
On Fri, 31 May 2002 05:01:48 +0800
"No Realm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is my /etc/network/interfaces:
>
> auto eth0
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.60.31
> netmask 255.255.255.0
> broadcast 192.168.60.255
> gateway 192.168.60.1
>
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet static
>
4 matches
Mail list logo