-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 04:20:42AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> The point is that cdrdao requires root priveledge to run, period
No, I meant I don't understand why someone would protect cdrao with sudo...
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 20:20, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set
> > up as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
>
> Well, sudo can be used as a means of authenticati
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 04:42:17AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> Using a setuid root program (sudo) to avoid having cdrecord or cdrdao set up
> as setuid root just does not any sense to me at all.
Well, sudo can be used as a means of authentication to l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:35:02AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Shoot the maintainer of xcdroast an email asking him about the issue,
> or open a wishlist bug.
Submitted wishlist bug against xcdroast.
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 20:59, Qian Gong wrote:
> > >
> > > Sudo is a solution.
> >
> > Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
> > can't he?
>
> No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
> specific options.
sudo is a setuid program, it need
Nathan E Norman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 02:07:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
>
> OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
> command line since xcdroast will do it all in on
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> > on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> > setuid.
> > > Sudo is a solution.
> >
> > Well, that way a user that can run cdrdao can run basically everything,
> > can't he?
> >
> No. By sudo you can limit the user to run a specific program, even with
> specific options.
In that case sudo might be worth looking into and I will do just that, :-)
Davi
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:23:59AM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> > > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 10:10:10AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> cdrecord asks the following debconf question:
OK, mybad. But xcdroast doesn't, and I never use cdrecord from the
command line since xcdroast will do it all in one shot for me.
- --
.'
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 11:24:36PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> > I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> > on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> > setuid.
> > Here is the way Debian installs cdrecord
> >
> > -rws--x---1 root cdrom177k Apr 9 2002 /usr/bin/cdrecord
>
> The package I see in unstable installs as -rwsr-xr-- if you're running
> setuid, which is much more sensible (there's a comment in the Debian
> policy manual noting tha
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> > permissions or something like that I should be able to control wh
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:41:29PM +0200, David Fokkema wrote:
> Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> permission
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 03:32:43AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> setuid. Afaik that is because
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 05:17:45AM +1000, bob parker wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Fur
> > Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> > glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> > cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> > permissions or something like that I should be able to control wh
On Thu, 3 Apr 2003 04:22, David Fokkema wrote:
>
> Well, you are right, so I tried, :-). It works, so there is reason to be
> glad. However, I'm still wondering how paranoid I must be to still want
> cdrdao to run without setuid. Furthermore, without setuid and with group
> permissions or somethin
> > > I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
> > >
> > > hth
> > > Bob
> >
> > If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
>
> I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
> on, but I observe that with a default Debian Woody install that cdrecord is
> se
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:56, David Fokkema wrote:
> >
> > I think you might need to setuid cdrdao
> >
> > hth
> > Bob
>
> If there is any other way, I'd rather not do that, :-)
I'm no expert really, and maybe there is some other permissions problem going
on, but I observe that with a default Debian
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
> > be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
> >
> > cdrdao scanbus
> >
> > should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
> > up as normal, everything works fine. The problem is th
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:07, David Fokkema wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recompiled cdrdao for stable and installed it on my server and I want to
> be able to use it as a regular user. Now,
>
> cdrdao scanbus
>
> should list all devices. As root, everything is ok, two IDE devices show
> up as normal, everything
23 matches
Mail list logo
