Re: capt segfaults

2000-11-19 Thread kmself
on Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 12:32:36PM +0100, Johannes Zellner ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:46:28PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > > > > Sig11's are often diagnostic of memory errors. Look at > > http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ It could be a real problem > > in capt, but if

Re: capt segfaults

2000-11-18 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
:: Johannes Zellner writes: >> http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ It could be a real problem >> in capt, but if it's seemingly random and/or unreproducable, look into the >> possibility that the error is in hardware. If it's not random and it's >> reproducable, file a bug. > this is the problem: it

Re: capt segfaults

2000-11-18 Thread Johannes Zellner
On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 02:46:28PM -0700, John Galt wrote: > > Sig11's are often diagnostic of memory errors. Look at ! Folks ! Although I'm new on this list I've yet /some/ knowledge about what SEGV could mean. (Thanks for your help anyway, help is always appreciated). > http://www.bitwizar

Re: capt segfaults

2000-11-17 Thread John Galt
Sig11's are often diagnostic of memory errors. Look at http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ It could be a real problem in capt, but if it's seemingly random and/or unreproducable, look into the possibility that the error is in hardware. If it's not random and it's reproducable, file a bug. On Fri,