On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 07:59:35AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-12-12 03:38 +0100, lee wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't there be an amd64 version of grub?
>
> There should be, but there isn't. Poking around in the source I found a
> pointer to a binutils bug, http://bugs.debian.org/244498. Appare
On 2008-12-12 03:38 +0100, lee wrote:
> Shouldn't there be an amd64 version of grub?
There should be, but there isn't. Poking around in the source I found a
pointer to a binutils bug, http://bugs.debian.org/244498. Apparently
nobody is really interested in resolving that issue, so you're on you
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 09:14:57AM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2008-12-11 08:49 +0100, lee wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > is grub executable on i386 only, or does it requre 32bit support in
> > the kernel?
>
> It does require 32-bit emulation on amd64, yes.
>
> > cat:/boot# file /usr/sbin/grub
> >
On 2008-12-11 08:49 +0100, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is grub executable on i386 only, or does it requre 32bit support in
> the kernel?
It does require 32-bit emulation on amd64, yes.
> cat:/boot# file /usr/sbin/grub
> /usr/sbin/grub: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV),
> static
4 matches
Mail list logo