On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 01:28, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-04 18:58:41 +1300]:
> > > kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00:16 0:00 xmms
> >
> > The state ``D'' means uninterruptible.
>
> Any idea why? Blocked waiting for I/O perhaps? A DMA event that ha
Matthew Gregan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-04 18:58:41 +1300]:
> > kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00:16 0:00 xmms
>
> The state ``D'' means uninterruptible.
Any idea why? Blocked waiting for I/O perhaps? A DMA event that has
not completed? It is a kernel question, but under what c
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 06:34:55AM -0500, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> any process, but I've run into one that just won't go ...
> kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00:16 0:00 xmms
The state ``D'' means uninterruptible.
Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 12:23, Rupert wrote:
> > > > Kevin Coyner told:
> > > > > I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> > > > > any process, but I've run into one that just won't go ...
> > > > >
> > > > > sakura:~$ ps aux |grep xmms
> > >
Gerald V. Livingston II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-03 13:34:01 -0600]:
Please don't quote the entire message. Please trim your messages to
reduce the clutter.
> How about killing these?
> root 31132 1 0 Oct31 ?00:00:00 [usb-storage-0]
> root 31133 1 0 Oct31 ?
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 11:31:53AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote..
> You can find parents easily using the [1]other syntax of 'ps'. I
> prefer this command. It will thread parent-child in a hierarchy which
> you can easily find the bad parents.
>
> ps -efH | less
I've noted this down in my l
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 12:31, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-04 00:31:17 +1100]:
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of Kevin Coyner told:
> > > > kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00
Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-11-04 00:31:17 +1100]:
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of Kevin Coyner told:
> > > kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00:16 0:00 xmms
> > > kosuke9027 0.0 0.0 0
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002 at 12:31:17AM +1100, Rob Weir wrote:
> Won't work. processes are ones which have died, but the
> kernel is keeping them around in case their parent cares about it's
> return value. AFAIK, it'll hang around, consuming no CPU time but some
> amount of swap, until you reboot.
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 12:23, Rupert wrote:
> > > Kevin Coyner told:
> > > > I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> > > > any process, but I've run into one that just won't go ...
> > > >
> > > > sakura:~$ ps aux |grep xmms
> > > > kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of
> Kevin Coyner told:
>
> >
> > I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> > any process, but I've run into one that just won't go ...
> >
> > sakura:~$
On Sun, 3 Nov 2002 13:10:14 +0100
Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote..
>
> > On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of
> > Kevin Coyner told:
> >
> > >
> > > I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote..
> On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of
> Kevin Coyner told:
>
> >
> > I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> > any process, but I've run into one that just w
On Sun, 03 Nov 2002 the mental interface of
Kevin Coyner told:
>
> I always thought that with 'kill -9 PID' you could clean up just about
> any process, but I've run into one that just won't go ...
>
> sakura:~$ ps aux |grep xmms
> kosuke9026 0.0 0.9 14460 4932 ? D 00:16 0:00 xmms
> ko
14 matches
Mail list logo
