I had a crazy time upgrading from sarge to sid, but eventually I got
through it. Here are some things I did.
1) do your kernel first - you need a >2.6.15 or everything will
break. I had to use dpkg with force-break and all that to just get
the packages that belonged to the kernel
2) If you ha
David Clymer wrote:
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 14:00 -0800, Tim Jordan wrote:
After building a debian box with the debian-31r1a-i386-netinst.iso I
want to upgrade this box to unstable. What is the correct way to do
this? I'm thinking I have to change my /etc/apt/sources.list to read
unstable,
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 18:14 -0800, Tim Jordan wrote:
> I guess I didn't make myself very clear - plus I used the wrong
> terminology because I thought "etch" was unstable, sorry about that.
The unstable branch is always named "sid." Only the stable and testing
branches change names.
>
> I've alr
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 08:39:12PM -0400, David Clymer wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 14:00 -0800, Tim Jordan wrote:
> > After building a debian box with the debian-31r1a-i386-netinst.iso I
> > want to upgrade this box to unstable. What is the correct way to do
> > this? I'm thinking I have to
I guess I didn't make myself very clear - plus I used the wrong
terminology because I thought "etch" was unstable, sorry about that.
I've already done the steps you listed below and the process choked,
which led me to believe that you can't go from stable right to unstable
without first upgrading
On Sat, 2006-04-08 at 14:00 -0800, Tim Jordan wrote:
> After building a debian box with the debian-31r1a-i386-netinst.iso I
> want to upgrade this box to unstable. What is the correct way to do
> this? I'm thinking I have to change my /etc/apt/sources.list to read
> unstable, but that didn't w
6 matches
Mail list logo
