On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 09:47:43AM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> / Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> | If you need to continue running a old, old, commercial, proprietary app
> | that requires an old version of libc (or anything else, really), you can
> | install it into it's own litt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ Rob Weir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| If you need to continue running a old, old, commercial, proprietary app
| that requires an old version of libc (or anything else, really), you can
| install it into it's own little chroot containing wh
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 03:38:37PM -0400, Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:54:40PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
> | Is it fair to assume that by the time this version of libc6 occurs
> | in a stable release, old commercial apps will run, or will they have
> | to be recompiled
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 12:54:40PM -0400, Norman Walsh wrote:
| / Harshwardhan Nagaonkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| | Well, icaclient is not the only commercial app that I have seen that
| | falls prey to this. A CAD designing software also segfaults with the
| | new libc (both of thes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
/ Harshwardhan Nagaonkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
| Well, icaclient is not the only commercial app that I have seen that
| falls prey to this. A CAD designing software also segfaults with the
| new libc (both of these work *great* on Woody
Anders Larsson wrote:
I updated unstable and now i cant run this icaclient. i did get this
segfault from another app as well but cant remeber what app it was :)
libc6 2.3.2-2
libc6-dev 2.3.2-2
kernel 2.4.20
(gdb) run
Starting program: /usr/lib/ICAClient/wfica
(no debu
6 matches
Mail list logo
