try to disable the flash plugin,then suggest use 'adblock plus' .
在 2008-04-10四的 22:07 -0400，Douglas A. Tutty写道：
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:45:32PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> > > all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> >
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/08 10:21, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
[snip]
Flash plugin (whatever the version) is always the root cause of my
Which version? (I run Sid.)
Iceweasel lock_up (due to swapping or other...) the number do not really
matte
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:23:05PM -0700, tom arnall wrote:
> i find that opera does ok if i start with a clean slate each time, i.e., no
> tabs from former session.
>
I don't do sessions at all anyway (whatever they are), i.e. I always
have a clean slate.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/12/08 09:02, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 04/11/08 19:54, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> You would write a script that would pole the relavant data. Probably
>>
>> That's just *disgusting*.
>>
>> Or I'm a dirty old
i find that opera does ok if i start with a clean slate each time, i.e., no
tabs from former session.
tom arnall
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:04:23PM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:10:04AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> >
> Yes, the system does thrash, not a complete lockup. But, if you try to
> move the cursor and few times with no results it certainly seem
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/08 19:54, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
[snip]
You would write a script that would pole the relavant data. Probably
That's just *disgusting*.
Or I'm a dirty old man.
Let me pole that for a sec...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:25:53PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> After a fresh login I'll have about 40-50Mb used, 0 swap. After
a few
>> hours of FF2.x I'd be maxed on memory and pushing 2/3rds of my 256Mb of
>> swap. Close FF and most of the memory and swap go awa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/08 19:54, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
[snip]
>
> You would write a script that would pole the relavant data. Probably
That's just *disgusting*.
Or I'm a dirty old man.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
We want... a Shrubbery!!
-BEG
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:10:04AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there any way, instead of restricting a resource, to have a command
executed when a setpoint for a given resource is reached? Say, when FF
uses 200M of virtual memory, or over 30% of CPU, a job runs whi
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 07:10:04AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Is there any way, instead of restricting a resource, to have a command
> executed when a setpoint for a given resource is reached? Say, when FF
> uses 200M of virtual memory, or over 30% of CPU, a job runs which pops
> up a warning
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 06:21:42PM +0200, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
>>
> >Thanks for this thread I thought I was alone with my Iceweasel issues...
> >Basically I'm running Lenny with optimized kernel but still low memory
> >configuration (512MB) on a Dell Pentium III.
512MB considered low-memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/08 10:21, Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
[snip]
> Flash plugin (whatever the version) is always the root cause of my
Which version? (I run Sid.)
> Iceweasel lock_up (due to swapping or other...) the number do not really
> matter but site such as
On 04/11/2008 09:10 AM, Marc Shapiro wrote:
Is there any way, instead of restricting a resource, to have a command
executed when a setpoint for a given resource is reached? Say, when FF
uses 200M of virtual memory, or over 30% of CPU, a job runs which pops
up a warning message. That way you k
Jean-Louis Crouzet wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 17:06, tom arnall wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
all
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 17:06, tom arnall wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
all of a sudden browsers have
On Friday 11 April 2008 16:10:04 Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Mumia W.. wrote:
> Is there any way, instead of restricting a resource, to have a command
> executed when a setpoint for a given resource is reached? Say, when FF
> uses 200M of virtual memory, or over 30% of CPU, a job runs which pops
> up a
Mumia W.. wrote:
You can restrict FF to use a limited amount of memory. Although it
would blow FF out of the water, you could do a "ulimit -Sv 20"
before starting firefox. Do this in a script.
If FF requires more than 200MB of virtual memory, the O/S will abort
it spontaneously. Okay, I a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/08 08:31, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 04/10/08 17:07, tom arnall wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> and what does CPU% look like?
>>
>> I know you asked this of Andy, but really the answer depends on the
>> web site. Dynamic sites
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 17:07, tom arnall wrote:
[snip]
and what does CPU% look like?
I know you asked this of Andy, but really the answer depends on the
web site. Dynamic sites that love Flash and thousands of animated
GIFs will use more
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What's npviewer?
A "proxy" daemon that will load and run 32 bits flashplugin on behalf
of your 64 bits browser.
Wihtout it you cannot have flash on amd64 arch.
HTH
--
Dominique Dumont
"Delivering successful solutions requires giving people what they
On 04/10/2008 10:24 PM, paragasu wrote:
same thing happen to me. i am using debian sid.
before i do dist-upgrade a week ago. i have the same problem. FF use
97% of the CPU after i open few tabs (my laptop using 256MB + Via C3 1G
CPU)..
especially when i watch youtube.
i have to kill the process
On Thursday 10 April 2008 19:11, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:25:53PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > On Thu, April 10, 2008 12:45 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> > > system.
> >
> > I can. FF2.x was just
same thing happen to me. i am using debian sid.
before i do dist-upgrade a week ago. i have the same problem. FF use
97% of the CPU after i open few tabs (my laptop using 256MB + Via C3 1G
CPU)..
especially when i watch youtube.
i have to kill the process manually from the terminal because FF stop
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:25:53PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, April 10, 2008 12:45 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> > system.
>
> I can. FF2.x was just painful on my laptop. It only has 256Mb and what
> i used to be abl
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:45:32PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> > all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%). i've
>
> I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> system.
Easy on my P-II, which is 32-bit (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 17:06, tom arnall wrote:
> On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
>> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>>> On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> all of a sudden browsers have becom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 17:07, tom arnall wrote:
[snip]
>
> and what does CPU% look like?
I know you asked this of Andy, but really the answer depends on the
web site. Dynamic sites that love Flash and thousands of animated
GIFs will use more CPU than calmer si
tom arnall wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
i've
I do
On Thursday 10 April 2008 23:37:03 Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/10/08 16:14, andy wrote:
> > Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> >> On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> >>>
On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> >>> all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> >>> i've
> >>
> >> I don't see how a single proces
On Thursday 10 April 2008 14:14, andy wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> >>> all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> >>> i've
> >>
> >> I don't see how a single proces
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 16:14, andy wrote:
> Thierry Chatelet wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
>>>
all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
i'
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
i've
I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
system.
tried
On Thursday 10 April 2008 13:25, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, April 10, 2008 12:45 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> > system.
>
> I can. FF2.x was just painful on my laptop. It only has 256Mb and
> what i used to be able to do ju
On Thursday 10 April 2008 21:45:32 Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> > all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> > i've
>
> I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> system.
>
> > tried iceweasel, opera, galeon. al
On Thu, April 10, 2008 12:45 pm, Ron Johnson wrote:
> I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> system.
I can. FF2.x was just painful on my laptop. It only has 256Mb and what
i used to be able to do just a few years ago (Firefox, Thunderbird and
gaim ne pidgin al
On Thursday 10 April 2008 12:45, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> > all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%).
> > i've
>
> I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
> system.
>
> > tried iceweasel, opera, galeon. all
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/10/08 14:35, tom arnall wrote:
> all of a sudden browsers have become memory hogs on my system (>95%). i've
I don't see how a single process could use 95% of memory on a 32-bit
system.
> tried iceweasel, opera, galeon. all with the same result
39 matches
Mail list logo
