On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 11:32:32 -0400 "Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Charlie
>wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:01:16 +0200 "Arno Schuring
>>>
>>>DMO?
>>
>> Sorry, silly question, but. what is DMO? Have been googling
>> it and not getting a
Charlie (aries...@skymesh.com.au on 2011-10-30 00:12 +1100):
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:01:16 +0200 "Arno Schuring
> aelschur...@hotmail.com" suggested this:
>
> >DMO?
>
> Sorry, silly question, but. what is DMO? Have been googling it
> and not getting anywhere, and it's late, or early.
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Charlie wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:01:16 +0200 "Arno Schuring
>>
>>DMO?
>
> Sorry, silly question, but. what is DMO? Have been googling it
> and not getting anywhere, and it's late, or early.
http://debian-multimedia.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:01:16 +0200 "Arno Schuring
aelschur...@hotmail.com" suggested this:
>DMO?
Sorry, silly question, but. what is DMO? Have been googling it
and not getting anywhere, and it's late, or early.
Charlie
--
Registered Linux User:- 329524
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Charlie
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:25:18 +0200 "Arno Schuring
> > aelschur...@hotmail.com" suggested this:
> >
> >>Charlie (aries...@skymesh.com.au on 2011-10-27 16:35 +1100):
> >>>
> >>> libavcodec52:
> >>> Depends: libavutil50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but 5:0
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Charlie wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:25:18 +0200 "Arno Schuring
> aelschur...@hotmail.com" suggested this:
>
>>Charlie (aries...@skymesh.com.au on 2011-10-27 16:35 +1100):
>>>
>>> libavcodec52:
>>> Depends: libavutil50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but 5:0.7.1-0.1 is to be
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 15:09:14 -0500 "Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com"
suggested this:
>Charlie writes:
>
>>>You have libavdevice52 installed and held at version
>>>5:0.6.1+svn20101128-0.2 which is too old.
>>>See your held packages with "aptitude search ~ahold". Try removing
>>>your hold with "a
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:25:18 +0200 "Arno Schuring
aelschur...@hotmail.com" suggested this:
>Charlie (aries...@skymesh.com.au on 2011-10-27 16:35 +1100):
>>
>> libavcodec52:
>> Depends: libavutil50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but 5:0.7.1-0.1 is to be
>> installed or libavutil-extra-50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but it i
Charlie writes:
>>You have libavdevice52 installed and held at version
>>5:0.6.1+svn20101128-0.2 which is too old.
>>See your held packages with "aptitude search ~ahold". Try removing
>>your hold with "aptitude unhold libavdevice52" and then try
>>reinstalling xvidcap.
Looking like I may have so
Charlie (aries...@skymesh.com.au on 2011-10-27 16:35 +1100):
>
> libavcodec52:
> Depends: libavutil50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but 5:0.7.1-0.1 is to be
> installed or libavutil-extra-50 (<4:0.6.2-99) but it is not
> installable
Do you have debian-multimedia in your sources.list by any chance? Or
have had
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 22:01:00 -0500 "Wu-Kung Sun sunwuk...@gmail.com"
suggested this:
>On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Charlie
>wrote:
>>
>> Debian Testing - 3.0.0-1-686-pae
>>
>> When attempting to install xvidcap with aptitude
>>
>> Receive this error:
>>
>> The following NEW packages will be
Daniel Dalton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install a deb package from a website, it only parcially
> installed, and now won't remove. I've even tried using the --force
> option, it just says I should try reinstalling, but when I do that I get
> errors with installations. So how do I remove this pack
On 6/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:26:56AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Wasyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When i want to install a package often i see such result:
> >
> >[~] % sudo apt-get install rhythmbox
> >Read
On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 07:26:56AM +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> On 6/25/06, Wasyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >When i want to install a package often i see such result:
> >
> >[~] % sudo apt-get install rhythmbox
> >Reading Package Lists... Done
> >Building Dependency Tree... Do
On 6/25/06, Wasyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
When i want to install a package often i see such result:
[~] % sudo apt-get install rhythmbox
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossibl
Missing python-twisted-core upgrade breaks all the other python-twisted
packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 25 June 2006 08:43, Wasyl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When i want to install a package often i see such result:
>
> [~] % sudo apt-get install rhythmbox
> [~] % sudo apt-get install gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
Both packages can be installed and removed fine. Cannot reproduce your
problem. Using De
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:11:19 +0100, Giorgio Raccanelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I tried to install gmc using the command
> apt-get install gmc
>
> but the answer was
>
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> gmc:Depends: gdk-imlib1 but it is no
Hello Travis,
thanks much for the tips! Debugging output from apt-get revealed "broken
dependency" on libidn11 in mutt; upgrading mutt solved the problem.
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 01:43:18AM -0400, Travis Crump wrote:
> Since sarge/sid's apt should no longer give this less than helpful error
> me
Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 06:30:03AM +0200, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
E: Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for openoffice.org.
So, I've updated apt and all Build-Depends packages manually. Now,
apt-get build-dep openoffice.org wants to
Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
Hello,
I'm experiencing the following problem:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-get build-dep openoffice.org
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhangigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
E: Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for
openo
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 06:30:03AM +0200, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote:
> E: Some broken packages were found while trying to process build-dependencies for
> openoffice.org.
So, I've updated apt and all Build-Depends packages manually. Now,
apt-get build-dep openoffice.org wants to remove libcurl3, li
Hi Joris
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> freetype2-dev: Depends: freetype2 (= 1.3.1-1)
> nautilus-extra: Depends: nautilus (= 1.0.6-7.1) but 2.0.8-1 is to be installed
> nautilus-suggested: Depends: nautilus (= 1.0.6-7.1) but 2.0.8-1 is to be installed
> E: Sor
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Bill Moseley wrote:
# apt-get install cupsys cupsys-bsd cupsys-pstoraster
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
._ The little penguin sat on the shore,
_@__watching Seneca write the letter
~ on the memorable day of 2002/11/03 19:37
> > How come the package is incomplete? How come there's NO FSCKING error message
>about it?
> dpkg -s textutils
> Packages change. What was once in t
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 06:48:18PM +0100, Jakub Turski wrote:
> I run debian unstable. Once in two or three days I run aptitude update
> && aptitude upgrade, and it proceeds without any visible errors - no-
> thing seems to be wrong. However, sometimes I get a 'truncated packages'
> -- a packa
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 10:34:22PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
>
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libgnome-dev: Depends: gdk-imlib-dev (>= 1.9.0-1) but it is not going to be
> installed
> Depends: libgtk1.2-dev but it is not going to be installe
Bill West wrote:
> Am I the only one or is the most recent epic4 and gnudip packages for slink
> x86 platform broken. Epic4 segfaults on all 6 machines I have upgraded it on
> and gnudip bombs out with postinst problems.
>
---end quoted text---
Nope, epic4 bombs here also. I don't use gnudip, so
28 matches
Mail list logo
