Re: bogomips ?

2003-02-20 Thread Anand Kumria
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:05:24AM +0200, Egor Tur wrote: > Hi. > A little question: programme `linux_logo' show 1264.84 Bogomips Total on my system, > but `bogomips' - 634.00 BogoMips. Why do these values be different? Possibly you have a dual-CPU machine since 634*2 ~= 1264. Cat /proc/cpuinfo f

Re: bogomips ?

2003-02-20 Thread nate
Egor Tur said: > Hi. > A little question: programme `linux_logo' show 1264.84 Bogomips Total on > my system, but `bogomips' - 634.00 BogoMips. Why do these values be > different? Thanx. maybe they use different methods to get the result. maybe there was some program running in the background that

Re: BogoMIPS ?

2000-02-19 Thread Onno
http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/mini/BogoMips Regards, Onno At 12:59 PM 2/19/00 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Hi there, > >could anyone please tell me what "BogoMIPS" at bootup means? > >Thanks in advance, > >Uwe > > >-- >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev

Re: BogoMIPS ?

2000-02-19 Thread Colin Watson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >could anyone please tell me what "BogoMIPS" at bootup means? See the BogoMips mini-HOWTO, which you should be able to find in /usr/doc/HOWTO or /usr/share/doc/HOWTO depending on your version of Debian. `MIPS is short for Millions of Instructions Per Second. It

Re: bogomips

1999-12-15 Thread Martin Fluch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Tim Nicholas wrote: > > Alberto Maurizi wrote: > > > Is this normal? I mean, that so low bogomips value. > > > > > model name : Pentium 60/66 > > > cpu MHz : 59.999660 > > > bogomips: 23.91 > > > > I've got an

Re: bogomips

1999-12-15 Thread William Burrow
On Thu, Dec 16, 1999 at 10:59:18AM +1300, Tim Nicholas wrote: > > Alberto Maurizi wrote: > > > Is this normal? I mean, that so low bogomips value. > > > > > model name : Pentium 60/66 > > > cpu MHz : 59.999660 > > > bogomips: 23.91 > > > > I've got an Intel P133. App

Re: bogomips

1999-12-15 Thread Tim Nicholas
> Alberto Maurizi wrote: > > > > Is this normal? I mean, that so low bogomips value. > > > model name : Pentium 60/66 > > > cpu MHz : 59.999660 > > > bogomips: 23.91 > > I've got an Intel P133. Approximating pro rata using your data > gives 23.91 / 60 * 133 = 53.

Re: bogomips

1999-12-15 Thread Paul Keenan
Alberto Maurizi wrote: > > Is this normal? I mean, that so low bogomips value. > model name : Pentium 60/66 > cpu MHz : 59.999660 > bogomips: 23.91 I've got an Intel P133. Approximating pro rata using your data gives 23.91 / 60 * 133 = 53. Actual reported value i

Re: Bogomips disparity

1999-03-09 Thread ktb
I remember this being discussed a month or so ago. You might take a look at the User's archives at, http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/ Good luck, Kent Pann McCuaig wrote: > I'll be looking for some docs to explain this, but in the meantime > perhaps someone knows off the top . . . > > Just

Re: bogomips

1998-11-13 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: bogomips Date: Fri, Nov 13, 1998 at 07:27:12AM -0600 > > I remember back in '98 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Yes. 2.0.34/35 on Slackware 149.9. On debian 2.0.34 120 Bogomips and > > on 2.0.35 130.6. The .config's on bot

Re: bogomips

1998-11-13 Thread fantomas
-> > w> Yes that would seem about right. The problem I have is that my -> > w> 166MMX gives me 149.9 BogoMips on my Slackware partition and only -> > w> 130.6 on my Debian partition. Same hardware (same box). -> > -> > Same kernelversion? The bogomips implementation changes sometimes. -> -> Yes.

Re: bogomips

1998-11-13 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: bogomips Date: Thu, Nov 12, 1998 at 12:56:21AM +0100 In reply to:Martin Bialasinski Quoting Martin Bialasinski([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > >> "w" == wtopa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > w> Yes that would seem about right. T

Re: bogomips

1998-11-12 Thread Oz Dror
> On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Oz Dror wrote: > > > Hi > > I have a pentium-II 400Mhz and a pentium MMX 200Mhz > > both have 400.59 bogomips > > Why? > > SWAG (Silly Wild-Assed Guess): > > The memory is the same speed? Since Intel guesses wrong in the branch > prediction, it must refetch the instruction

Re: bogomips

1998-11-12 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "w" == wtopa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: w> Yes that would seem about right. The problem I have is that my w> 166MMX gives me 149.9 BogoMips on my Slackware partition and only w> 130.6 on my Debian partition. Same hardware (same box). Same kernelversion? The bogomips implementation changes

Re: bogomips

1998-11-11 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: bogomips Date: Wed, Nov 11, 1998 at 01:19:22PM +0100 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > > On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 10:24:46PM -0800, Oz Dror wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > I

Re: bogomips

1998-11-11 Thread jd?
i'm running a 2.0.33 kernel from the installation disks and it gives me 400.59 Bogomips for a pentium 200MMX running on a compaq laptop. I recompiled the kernel and it gave me about 208 bogomips after the new kernel was recompiled, and the bogomips mystery continued. btw, i did read the bogo

Re: bogomips

1998-11-11 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> > On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 10:24:46PM -0800, Oz Dror wrote: > > > > Hi > > I have a pentium-II 400Mhz and a pentium MMX 200Mhz > > both have 400.59 bogomips > > Why? > > > > MMX doubles your bogomips. MMX CPUs are evidently great at running > empty loops. Every Pentium II has MMX. Anyway, fo

Re: bogomips

1998-11-11 Thread Mike Touloumtzis
On Tue, Nov 10, 1998 at 10:24:46PM -0800, Oz Dror wrote: > > Hi > I have a pentium-II 400Mhz and a pentium MMX 200Mhz > both have 400.59 bogomips > Why? > MMX doubles your bogomips. MMX CPUs are evidently great at running empty loops. miket

Re: bogomips

1998-11-11 Thread AJT60
On Tue, 10 Nov 1998, Oz Dror wrote: > Hi > I have a pentium-II 400Mhz and a pentium MMX 200Mhz > both have 400.59 bogomips > Why? > Because bogomips are bogus and meaningless? Andrew Tarr "If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate" |___ http://multinet.co.nz/personalho