Re: bind and address rewriting

2000-10-11 Thread John L . Fjellstad
On Fri, Oct 06, 2000 at 12:34:00AM +0200, Thomas Voss wrote: > Anyway, even if bind would run on the firewall box, the problem would > remain the same, i.e. bind would send a UDP packet which has to bring up > the line (forcing a new IP for the interface), and which therefore leaves > with the wr

Re: bind and address rewriting

2000-10-05 Thread John L . Fjellstad
On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 03:37:00PM +0200, Thomas Voss wrote: > Does anybody has an idea about that? Maybe I'm missing the point here, but why do you think you need to MASQ these packages? When a box from your internal network do a lookup, it checks with BIND on your boundary/firewall box. BIND

Re: bind and address rewriting

2000-10-03 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > > Hello, > > I have a linux box (Debian 2.2, kernel 2.2.17) running as an ISDN dial-on- > demand gateway to my ISP. The ISP is assigning dynamic IP adresses, and I > have address rewriting