Re: bin86

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Pfeifer
That error seems to get just about everyone when compiling a kernel the first time. If you look back in the debian-user archives far enough, you'll find me asking about it. The base system is only meant to get enough of a running system so that you can then go ahead and install the rest. It should

Re: bin86

2001-01-16 Thread Ben Collins
On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote: > The debian.org site says that bin86 "a complete 8086 assembler and > loader which can make 32-bit code for the 386+ processors (under Linux > it's used only to create the 16-bit bootsector and setup binaries)." > It is not installed in

Re: bin86 missing (was Re: compiling new kernel)

2000-03-09 Thread muggles
well, some people ( myself included ) rarely if ever use dselect and should not be bound to do so just get this "standard" package installed. i've compiled enough kernels and done enough installs and could argue that i myself would install this package by rote but that has yet to be the case and

RE: bin86 missing (was Re: compiling new kernel)

2000-03-08 Thread Bryan Scaringe
First thing I did after my install was remove all unused packages that didn't cause dselect to have kittens. bin86 was one of them. found that out quick enough. The second thing I tried to do after install was recompile he kernel. Bryan > I can't understand how so many people seem to "lose" bi