On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:30:05PM -0300, fmn...@fmneto.com.br wrote:
> On 2018-10-19 23:19, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Dominik George writes:
> >
> > > >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
> > >
> > > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
> > > s
On 2018-10-19 23:19, Ben Finney wrote:
Dominik George writes:
>> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
shipped with their sources?
They don't forbid that.
What they forbid is redistributing the modified
Dominik George writes:
> >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
>
> Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
> shipped with their sources?
They don't forbid that.
What they forbid is redistributing the modified work with the Pale Moon
branding.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 12:28:16PM +0300, Reco wrote:
>
> Ridiculous or not, but stable's firefox-esr contains their own private
> version of NSS - [1]. Same for the thunderbird.
> But they try to keep it sane, so at least firefox does not embed
> 'correct' version of GTK3, for example.
>
That i
On 2018-10-19 11:23, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:26:20AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote:
> > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
>
> Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
> shipped with thei
On Friday 19 October 2018 03:26:20 mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote:
> >>> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
> >
> > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is
> > not shipped with their sources?
> >
> > That also seems like
On Friday 19 October 2018 00:24:43 Ben Finney wrote:
> Doug writes:
> > On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote:
> > > Palemoon means extremely hostile upstream - [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
> >
> > I would like to know what you mean by "extremely hostile ups
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:26:20AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
> On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote:
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
> >
> > Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
> > shipped with their sources?
> >
>
Hi.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 08:58:07AM +0200, Dominik George wrote:
> >> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
>
> Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped
> with their sources?
>
> That also seems like a security nightmare in the m
On 2018-10-19 07:58, Dominik George wrote:
> [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not
shipped with their sources?
That also seems like a security nightmare in the making.
Mozilla themselves weren't even *that*
>> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
Seriously? They forbid linking against libraries if their code is not shipped
with their sources?
That also seems like a security nightmare in the making.
Mozilla themselves weren't even *that* ridiculous, were they?
-nik
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 07:13:20PM -0400, Doug wrote:
>
> On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum.
> > > >
> > > > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-br
Doug writes:
> On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote:
> > Palemoon means extremely hostile upstream - [1].
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/issues/86
> >
> I would like to know what you mean by "extremely hostile upstream"
Reco anticipated your wish to know, and provided a concre
On 18/10/2018 18.16, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
What the world needs (badly) is more browser alternatives. I'm
seeing everything converging towards the dystopia where one huge
corporation controls the server and the client. We had that, and
it wasn't pretty; nowadays with smartphones, always-on, IoT
On 10/18/2018 04:49 AM, Reco wrote:
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum.
More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/
Indeed, it does look good.
No, it does not. UXP means Palemoon Browser.
P
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:53:19PM +0200, basti wrote:
> On 18.10.2018 16:29, Reco wrote:
> > If only Debian project did something about Firefox privacy settings.
> > Let's face it - Mozilla are hypocrites. They loudly 'care about users'
> > privacy', but then force their 'opt-out tele
On 18.10.2018 16:29, Reco wrote:
> If only Debian project did something about Firefox privacy settings.
> Let's face it - Mozilla are hypocrites. They loudly 'care about users'
> privacy', but then force their 'opt-out telemetry' on you.
> Debian's Firefox build disables some of the offending setti
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:40:51AM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > That would mean (in the context of Debian) that one would have to
> > (a) use the Basilisk-bundled libs (generally a no-no in Debian)
> > or (b) use a different name & brand. Yes, we know this story with
> > Firefo
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:16:54AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum.
> > > >
> > > > More Infos he
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum.
> > >
> > > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/
> >
> > Indeed, it does look good.
>
>
Hi.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:02:42AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > I think its an good alternative to Firefox Quantum.
> >
> > More Infos here: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/
>
> Indeed, it does look good.
No, it does not. UXP means Palemoon Browser.
Palemoon means extremely h
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 09:01:21AM +0200, basti wrote:
> Hello,
> please add basilisk-browser to debian repo.
Wrong list :-)
The right way to do it is to file a RFP (== "Request for Package")
bug. The Wiki [1] has more details on that.
If you (or someone else) is interested in that, there's a bi
22 matches
Mail list logo
