Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXV, Pétùr a écrit :
> Le 08/07/2017 à 18:34, Reco a écrit :
> >> Any idea?
> >>
> >> $ duplicity restore --gio --time=2017-07-06T08:14:08Z --force
> >> file:///home/pierre/data/backup_pierre / --verbosity=9
> >> --gpg-options=--no-use-agent --archive-dir=/home/pierre/.c
Hi.
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 20:42:00 +0200
Pétùr wrote:
> Le 08/07/2017 à 18:34, Reco a écrit :
> >> Any idea?
> >>
> >> $ duplicity restore --gio --time=2017-07-06T08:14:08Z --force
> >> file:///home/pierre/data/backup_pierre / --verbosity=9
> >> --gpg-options=--no-use-agent --archive-dir=/h
Le 08/07/2017 à 18:37, Nicolas George a écrit :
> Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXV, Nicolas George a écrit :
>> This specific error message is always the sign of a severe bug in the
>> program.
> Hum, I had not imagined the wrong file descriptor was requested on
> purpose. The severe bug was not in
Le 08/07/2017 à 18:34, Reco a écrit :
>> Any idea?
>>
>> $ duplicity restore --gio --time=2017-07-06T08:14:08Z --force
>> file:///home/pierre/data/backup_pierre / --verbosity=9
>> --gpg-options=--no-use-agent --archive-dir=/home/pierre/.cache/deja-dup
>> --tempdir=/tmp --log-fd=22
> Sure. Don't ask
Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXV, Nicolas George a écrit :
> This specific error message is always the sign of a severe bug in the
> program.
Hum, I had not imagined the wrong file descriptor was requested on
purpose. The severe bug was not in the program but in the caller.
Regards,
--
Nicolas
Le decadi 20 messidor, an CCXXV, Pétùr a écrit :
> "OSError: [Errno 9] Bad file descriptor"
This specific error message is always the sign of a severe bug in the
program. One that leaves 0 confidence in said program.
If it comes from you backup program, it is entirely possible your
backups have b
Hi.
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 18:28:49 +0200
Pétùr wrote:
> Any idea?
>
> $ duplicity restore --gio --time=2017-07-06T08:14:08Z --force
> file:///home/pierre/data/backup_pierre / --verbosity=9
> --gpg-options=--no-use-agent --archive-dir=/home/pierre/.cache/deja-dup
> --tempdir=/tmp --log-fd
On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Eric G. Miller wrote:
> > home:~ #df 1>&-
> > df: write error: Bad file descriptor
> > Is it a bug?
> > ">&-" should be compatible with ">/dev/null", right?
Well, no. AFAIK, >&- means to *close* the stdout file descriptor, while
>/dev/null means to redirect (i.e. open) stdout
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001 14:42:15 +0800, Patrick Hsieh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> home:~ #df 1>&-
> df: write error: Bad file descriptor
>
> Is it a bug?
> ">&-" should be compatible with ">/dev/null", right?
If it is, it must be with "df" as other programs don't complain.
--
Eric G. Mi
On Sunday 14 October 2001 05:26, Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:18:55 PDT, Kevin writes:
> >its got nothing to do with the attribs or the perms
> >
> >lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on
> > ./guide.it.html
> >
> >and i cant fsck it because im not local and
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 22:18:55 PDT, Kevin writes:
>its got nothing to do with the attribs or the perms
>
>lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on ./guide.it.html
>
>and i cant fsck it because im not local and cant go to single user.
>oh well, thanks for the help
Maybe you don
its got nothing to do with the attribs or the perms
lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags on ./guide.it.html
and i cant fsck it because im not local and cant go to single user.
oh well, thanks for the help
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 08:07:12PM -0700, Kevin wrote:
> > [EMAIL
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 08:07:12PM -0700, Kevin wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/apt# chmod 644 guide.it.html
> chmod: changing permissions of `guide.it.html': Operation not permitted
try lsattr guide.it.html, guess the 'i' attribute is set (immutable)
chattr -i guide.it.html should fix it
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/apt# chmod 644 guide.it.html
chmod: changing permissions of `guide.it.html': Operation not permitted
>
> >> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:01:40 PDT, Kevin writes:
> >> >it looks like the filesystem is screwed up
> >> >
> >> >is there a way i can remove/fix this file remot
>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:01:40 PDT, Kevin writes:
>> >it looks like the filesystem is screwed up
>> >
>> >is there a way i can remove/fix this file remotely (ie no init 1)
>> >
>> >?-wS--x-w- 25830 3373684167 3802483123 14067798681382885448 Sep 2 1905 g
>uid
>> >e.it.html
>>
>> Long shot: Hav
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/doc/apt# cat /dev/null >guide.it.html
su: guide.it.html: Permission denied
and as for just trying to rm it, i already showed i cant do that
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:01:40 PDT, Kevin writes:
> >it looks like the filesystem is screwed up
> >
> >is there a way i can remo
On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:01:40 PDT, Kevin writes:
>it looks like the filesystem is screwed up
>
>is there a way i can remove/fix this file remotely (ie no init 1)
>
>?-wS--x-w- 25830 3373684167 3802483123 14067798681382885448 Sep 2 1905 guid
>e.it.html
Long shot: Have you tried `cat /dev/null >g
Kevin([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> it looks like the filesystem is screwed up
>
> is there a way i can remove/fix this file remotely (ie no init 1)
>
> ?-wS--x-w- 25830 3373684167 3802483123 14067798681382885448 Sep 2 1905
> guide.it.html
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/share/do
18 matches
Mail list logo
