Hi, Paul:
On Saturday 21 November 2009 00:36:12 Paul E Condon wrote:
> On 20091120_212056, Jes?s M. Navarro wrote:
[...]
> > Unfortunately? I'd better say "by design". Unstable/Testing is not
> > there to provide a product to final users but to provide a testbed for
> > software integration.
On 20091120_212056, Jes?s M. Navarro wrote:
> Hi Gerfried:
>
> On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:55:25 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Thanks to Sven for bringing the thread to my attention.
> >
> > * Sven Hoexter [2009-11-19 08:42:49 CET]:
> > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM +0700,
Hi Gerfried:
On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:55:25 Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks to Sven for bringing the thread to my attention.
>
> * Sven Hoexter [2009-11-19 08:42:49 CET]:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> > > I have searched backport, wiki web s
Hi!
Thanks to Sven for bringing the thread to my attention.
* Sven Hoexter [2009-11-19 08:42:49 CET]:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> > I have searched backport, wiki web sites and still can not
> > understand: does debian security team works with its pack
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:16:15PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I have searched backport, wiki web sites and still can not understand: does
> debian security team works with its packages or not? In other words, using
> stable only and desiring the same security quality, I would not us
* John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-04 18:34]:
> Felix C. Stegerman writes:
> > I'll stick with stable and backport mysql, vim and the kernel
> > myself.
>
> First check backports.org. Someone probably has already done it
> (and there are 2.6 kernels in Stable).
backports.org has mysql-se
Felix C. Stegerman writes:
> I'll stick with stable and backport mysql, vim and the kernel myself.
First check backports.org. Someone probably has already done it (and there
are 2.6 kernels in Stable).
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
* "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 16:33]:
> Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm running unstable on my desktop (well, actually a laptop), so I'm
> > accustomed to the occasional breakage and could probably live with it.
> >
> > I'm just reluctant to use unstable on a produc
* Johannes Wiedersich [2006-06-01 17:53]:
> Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
> > Do you know what would be the best way to make sure I don't miss any
> > of those updates? If I backport e.g. mysql from unstable/testing,
> > will I be able to rely on security announcements to debian-security,
> > or do
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> Do you know what would be the best way to make sure I don't miss any
> of those updates? If I backport e.g. mysql from unstable/testing,
> will I be able to rely on security announcements to debian-security,
> or do I need to check for new vulnerabilities upstream?
J
George Borisov wrote:
> Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
>>Wouldn't mixing stable and testing be less secure than using
>>backports? Or is security support for testing good enough to rely on
>>for (some packages on) production servers?
>
>
> Supposedly testing gets security updates now. It is in
> s
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
> Wouldn't mixing stable and testing be less secure than using
> backports? Or is security support for testing good enough to rely on
> for (some packages on) production servers?
Supposedly testing gets security updates now. It is in
security.debian.org together with
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
> I'm running unstable on my desktop (well, actually a laptop), so I'm
> accustomed to the occasional breakage and could probably live with it.
>
> I'm just reluctant to use unstable on a production server connected to
> the internet, because I don't want to leave the
* Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 14:47]:
> > > It is said that compiling your own kernel with make-kpkg should
> > > be pretty easy. It generates a kernel package which you can than
> > > install with "dpkg -i". Never tried it myself though ...
> > > Compiling smaller software is ge
* "Roberto C. Sanchez" [2006-06-01 14:59]:
> Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> >
> > I've thought about using unstable (see an earlier thread I
> > started), and decided to go with stable instead. But it's nice to
> > know that unstable can be used with very little problem.
> >
>
> In general, there
* George Borisov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 11:39]:
> Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
> >
> > I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
> > would rather like to have the latest versions of:
> > * mysql (5.0)
> > * vim (7.0)
> > * the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
>
> T
* Johannes Wiedersich [2006-06-01 12:39]:
> > I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
> > would rather like to have the latest versions of:
> > * mysql (5.0)
> > * vim (7.0)
> > * the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
> > Since these are not in sarge, I'm considering usin
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
> I've thought about using unstable (see an earlier thread I started),
> and decided to go with stable instead. But it's nice to know that
> unstable can be used with very little problem.
>
In general, there are not too many problems or breakages with unstable.
Occa
"Felix C. Stegerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 08:10]:
> > > * Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
> > > kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
> > > from ? Should I (try to) bac
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
Hi,
I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
would rather like to have the latest versions of:
* mysql (5.0)
* vim (7.0)
* the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
Since these are not in sarge, I'm considering using backported
versions from backp
Felix C. Stegerman wrote:
>
> I'm about to install sarge on a (production) server of my own, and
> would rather like to have the latest versions of:
> * mysql (5.0)
> * vim (7.0)
> * the Linux kernel (2.6.16) [ppc]
The latter will probably cause the most problems. The Debian packages of
the
* Robert Van Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 08:41]:
> > * Are you using unofficial repositories (e.g. backports.org) on
> > production servers ?
> > * Do you (and can I) trust backports.org ?
> > * Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
> > kernel 2.6.1
* Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-01 08:10]:
> > * Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
> > kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
> > from ? Should I (try to) backport them myself ?
>
> It is said that compiling your o
"Felix C. Stegerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Also, since even backports.org does not seem to have vim 7.0 and
> kernel 2.6.16 (yet), what would be the best way/place to get these
> from ? Should I (try to) backport them myself ?
It is said that compiling your own kernel with mak
24 matches
Mail list logo
