On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:22:58 -0500
Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> $ java -version
> java version "1.4.2-03"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build
> Blackdown-1.4.2-03) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build
> Blackdown-1.4.2-03, mixed mode)
>
Please try to install
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 05:50:48PM -0600, Michael Shuler wrote:
> On 01/12/2008 05:15 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:01:09AM +0100, Peter Greff wrote:
>>> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:37:02 -0500
>>> Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
When I launch azureus I get a ful
On 01/12/2008 05:15 PM, Rick Pasotto wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:01:09AM +0100, Peter Greff wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:37:02 -0500
Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I launch azureus I get a full-screen window with a black background
in the middle of which in white letters i
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:01:09AM +0100, Peter Greff wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:37:02 -0500
> Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When I launch azureus I get a full-screen window with a black background
> > in the middle of which in white letters is: "Loading...Please Wait".
> >
>
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:37:02 -0500
Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I launch azureus I get a full-screen window with a black background
> in the middle of which in white letters is: "Loading...Please Wait".
>
> Fifteen+ minutes and there has been no change. How long am I supposed to
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 12:19 -0300, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running Azureus 2.2.0.2 in sarge. Each time Azureus starts, I
> receive a warning regarding new updates availables. Is it safe to
> upgrade Azureus accepting the suggested upgrade?
>
Update will work just fine.. But
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 11:54 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running Azureus 2.2.0.2 in sarge. Each time Azureus starts, I
> > receive a warning regarding new updates availables. Is it safe to
> > upgrade Azureus accepting the suggested upgrade?
Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running Azureus 2.2.0.2 in sarge. Each time Azureus starts, I
> receive a warning regarding new updates availables. Is it safe to
> upgrade Azureus accepting the suggested upgrade?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Marcelo
>
>
Probably not. The built-in A
On Monday, February 06, 2006 6:30 AM -0600, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> my router, I guess, is with my IP provider... I can't do anything in
> that machine...
If you are behind a NAT router, that is the place that you have to
forward ports. Ask your ISP how to log in to your router. Get a manu
On Monday 06 February 2006 07:30, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
>Hello Gene,
>
>thank you very much for your answer. However, I am a completly
> ignorant regarding NAT... after reading your advice, I went to the
> NAT howto and I was scared...
>
>On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:26 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
Hello Gene,
thank you very much for your answer. However, I am a completly ignorant
regarding NAT... after reading your advice, I went to the NAT howto and
I was scared...
On Mon, 2006-01-30 at 19:26 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Monday 30 January 2006 17:59, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> >Dear
I wrote:
> They may simply block anything they can't analyze.
Chris Howie writes:
> That's a recipie for disaster for any ISP -- they would have to
> anticipate every application that will be used by their clients and
> authorize it on their analyzer. And if something like this did happen,
> chan
Scott wrote:
> Calm down. Software malfunction.
>
> I just discovered the problem before I got back here and saw your reply.
> It wasn't intentional.
Sorry, I didn't mean to come across as angry or upset, I only meant to add
emphasis for the case where it might be intentional (it's happened befo
Edward Shornock wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:54:12PM -0700, Debian-user wrote:
Chris Howie wrote:
>1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
What's wrong with using port 6881?
Some trackers will reject any connections from clients on the default
port(s).
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 04:54:12PM -0700, Debian-user wrote:
> Chris Howie wrote:
>
> >1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
>
> What's wrong with using port 6881?
Some trackers will reject any connections from clients on the default
port(s).
signature.asc
D
Chris Howie wrote:
Debian-user wrote:
1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
What's wrong with using port 6881?
Please *DO NOT* set your 'From' address to the list address. It's confusing as
I have no way to tell who sent the message. Adjust your mail clie
John Hasler wrote:
> Chris Howie writes:
>>Watch ISPs try to filter that. The TLS/SSL wrapper keeps them from
>>filtering by analyzing the protocol.
>
> They may simply block anything they can't analyze.
That's a recipie for disaster for any ISP -- they would have to anticipate
every application
Chris Howie writes:
> Watch ISPs try to filter that. The TLS/SSL wrapper keeps them from
> filtering by analyzing the protocol.
They may simply block anything they can't analyze.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
On Monday 30 January 2006 17:59, Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
>Dear debianners,
>
>I've just installed Azureus as my .torrent client. During its
>configuration the wizard checks for the 6881 TCP port reporting the
>following message: "Testing port 6881... NAT error". I would like to
>know how to op
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
>
> Are you suggesting this for a reason? or just for diagnostic purposes. I
> don't do much with torrent, but once in a whileI do and it never seems to
> quite work very well. and yes I port
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:28:27 -0500
Chris Howie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> > I've just installed Azureus as my .torrent client. During its
> > configuration the wizard checks for the 6881 TCP port reporting the
> > following message: "Testing port 6881... NAT error"
Debian-user wrote:
>> 1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
>
> What's wrong with using port 6881?
Please *DO NOT* set your 'From' address to the list address. It's confusing as
I have no way to tell who sent the message. Adjust your mail client settings
befor
Chris Howie wrote:
1) Don't use port 6881. Pick something random in the 49152-65535 range.
What's wrong with using port 6881?
Curiously,
--
Scott
www.angrykeyboarder.com
© 2006 angrykeyboarder™ & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
Marcelo Chiapparini wrote:
> I've just installed Azureus as my .torrent client. During its
> configuration the wizard checks for the 6881 TCP port reporting the
> following message: "Testing port 6881... NAT error". I would like to
> know how to open this port. I've surfed the list, googled the w
24 matches
Mail list logo
