Re: autoup.sh v0.28 released

1998-07-23 Thread JonesMB
Now you tell me about the autoup.sh v0.28 upgrade :-) Yesterday I did some more hunting and found the 2 packages that autoup.sh v0.27 expected to be in libs - I found them in base. I downloaded them and autoup'ed again. It installed everything but it still complained about some conflicts. Af

Re: autoup.sh fails when upgrading bo -> hamm

1998-07-23 Thread Kent West
I got the same message when I tried to run autoup.sh. However, I was trying to run it on a hamm system instead of trying to do an upgrade from bo. This is because I'm a newbie and don't know what I'm doing yet. Nonetheless, thought I'd let everyone know I saw the error also. At 07:43 PM 7/23/1998

Re: autoup.sh fails when upgrading bo -> hamm

1998-07-23 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, JonesMB wrote: > I am trying to upgrade from bo to hamm so I can run the new bash and > try wine. > > I run autoup.sh and it ftp'ed the files needed for the upgrade. It > failed to get me the file libstdc++2.8_*.deb > > [...deleted...] autoup.sh is expecting to find it in li

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Norris Preyer
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thanx for the fast replies. > > I'd like to have two emacsen if possible or one that will fit the bill for > both purposes. The machine I'm working on upgrading is going to be an > experimental Amateur radio packet machine and is somewhat minimalist. (48

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Young, Ed wrote: > > > Ok, I'm still confused... > > Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming. No, that's not what I meant. IIRC, there was once emacs and now there are emacs19 and emacs20 and no plain "emacs". If you have a bo "emacs" package, you

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Young, Ed
e to try it as long as it will coexist with GNU Emacs. Any comments or caveats or experiences here? My priorities: Emacs (of some variety) X AX25Utils. I also need to be able to compile and do some code development. Thanx, Ed > Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs > >

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Norris Preyer
"Young, Ed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I'm still confused... > > Emacs? Not part of the current distribution? This is alarming. There are now *four* emacsen in hamm: emacs-19.34, emacs-20.2, xemacs-19.16, and xemacs-20.4, and you need to choose which you want. The "emacs" package is obso

RE: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Young, Ed
ob Nielsen [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 1998 9:01 AM > To: Edward J. Young > Cc: debian list > Subject: Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs > > On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote: > > > > > > > I should mention tha

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Edward J. Young wrote: > > > I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for > packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean > what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded > around it and now it needs up

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Chea Prince
i had the same thing happen and i had selected to upgrade emacs to 20.xx...made a mess. it was the only really broken package. had been wanting to check out xemacs so ended up purging emacs and installing xemacs-20.whatever and like it. anyway, suspect you will need to purge emacs and do a clean

Re: autoup.sh + deselect broke emacs

1998-07-08 Thread Edward J. Young
I should mention that in the deselect screen, there are headings for packages that are headed as "obsolete", one being emacs. Does this mean what I think: that emacs 19.34.? is now obsolete because I've upgraded around it and now it needs upgrading too? Probobly. There are some other packages l

Re: autoup.sh availability

1998-07-05 Thread treacy
> Craig Sanders' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ftp|http sites at > debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup/ often have poor connectivity, at least for > North American users. The following files are now available at > www.debian.org/~hilliard: > [snip] Is there any reason you don't just use http://www.debian.or

Re: autoup.sh by ftp

1998-07-03 Thread servis
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul) | | Hello Brian, | | thanks for your prompt reply. I have been trying the URL | you gave me, http://www.debian.org/news#19980624, and I | checked through the whole directory tree of ftp.debian.org | but I haven't found autoup.sh anywhere where it is | accessible per ftp.

Re: autoup.sh by ftp

1998-07-03 Thread servis
*-Hans Ehrbar ( 3 Jul) | | Is there an address where I can get autoup.sh and the | other files necessary for updating by ftp? | Check http://www.debian.org/news#19980624 for a list of sites. Brian -- Mechanical Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] Purdue University

Re: two suggestions re autoup.sh

1998-06-29 Thread Bob Hilliard
Hi, It's not my script - that honor belongs to Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who saw the need and developed it. I made some minor contributions, and wrote the README. The necessity of running dselect several times is a dpkg/dselect issue that is well known, and is mentioned in inst

Re: autoup.sh v0.25 released

1998-04-21 Thread Craig Sanders
> I've just released version 0.24 which fixes this (and a few minor problems > too). > > v0.24: 1998-04-21 (Craig Sanders) > - added libstdc++, libslang0.99.34 (libc5), libslang0.99.38 (libc6), >netbase, and netstd to the list of packages to install. > - changed 'unstable' to 'frozen' in var

Re: autoup.sh v0.25 released

1998-04-21 Thread Craig Sanders
BTW, i've also made some changes to my http://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup site. 1. updated autoup.tar.gz to have the latest versions of all the needed packages. 2. made it accessible as ftp://debian.vicnet.net.au/autoup (some people requested this) 3. made a debfiles/ directory which

autoup.sh v0.24 released (was Re: autoup.sh bug)

1998-04-20 Thread Craig Sanders
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 07:15:23PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I did a bo--hamm upgrade over the weekend using your autoup.sh: > > $Id: autoup.sh,v 0.23 1998/03/26 15:31:10 root Exp root $ > > and got this when it got to installing dpkg: > > > dpkg: regarding .../base/dpkg_1.4.0.22.deb

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-10 Thread Bob Hilliard
Henry Hollenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm > upgrade from 1.3.1. This is not really appropriate for the developers list, so I have dropped that list from the address. From the Debian libc5 to libc6 Mini-HOWTO, by

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-10 Thread Remco Blaakmeer
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Henry Hollenberg wrote: > After running autoup.sh where do I point dselect to complete the hamm > upgrade from 1.3.1. Where you first used "stable", "contrib" and "non-free", now use "dists/unstable/main", "dists/unstable/contrib" and "dists/unstable/non-free". The rest is th

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Mon, 9 Mar 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : : I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the : URL? http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh the script works great, btw - I've had no troubles so far (3 vastly different machines) -- Nathan Norman MidcoNet - 410 South Phi

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Bob Hilliard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the > URL? Look on www.debian.org or http://taz.net.au/autoup/ -- _ |_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-09 Thread Steve Mayer
Mike, http://www.debian.org/devel/autoup.sh Steve Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've lost my link to this script. Could somebody please post the > URL? > > Micro$oft, what do you want to spend today? > > -- > E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: autoup.sh

1998-03-06 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Fri, 6 Mar 1998, Carroll Kong wrote: : Whoa... tried upgrading and I think I got confused. Shouldn't I erase : my old packages via dselect? Then change my access to ftp and get all the hamm : packages, then run autoup.sh? : : : Carroll Kong Pretty much the opposite. Run autoup.sh, th

Re: autoup.sh

1998-01-28 Thread Craig Sanders
On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Tim Sailer wrote: > A few thing... > > libpthread0 needs to be removed, or libc6 doesn't install > libg++ needs to be removed, or libg++272 which version of the script do you have? libpthread0 has been in the script's remove list since v0.08 you can get the latest version