Re: attach3...aprox 189kB

2002-05-30 Thread Ian D. Stewart
On 2002.05.30 03:48 Tom Cook wrote: On 0, Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I just began posting on this list and thankfully received a lot of replies. > A few of them included an atachment and most of the attachments from > different people were called attach3. When I went to have

Re: attach3...aprox 189kB

2002-05-30 Thread Ian D. Stewart
On 2002.05.30 03:59 ben wrote: On Thursday 30 May 2002 12:21 am, Arthur Dent wrote: > Hi > I just began posting on this list and thankfully received a lot of replies. > A few of them included an atachment and most of the attachments from > different people were called attach3. When I went to have

Re: attach3...aprox 189kB

2002-05-30 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:18:32PM +0930, Tom Cook wrote: > Those attachments (as you will find at the end of this mail) are > indeed 'some sort of privacy thing' - sort of. They are signatures to > verify where the mail came from. Now don't quote me on this, but I > believe the way the signatur

Re: attach3...aprox 189kB

2002-05-30 Thread ben
On Thursday 30 May 2002 12:21 am, Arthur Dent wrote: > Hi > I just began posting on this list and thankfully received a lot of replies. > A few of them included an atachment and most of the attachments from > different people were called attach3. When I went to have a quick look at > one of them it

Re: attach3...aprox 189kB

2002-05-30 Thread Tom Cook
On 0, Arthur Dent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > I just began posting on this list and thankfully received a lot of replies. > A few of them included an atachment and most of the attachments from > different people were called attach3. When I went to have a quick look at > one of them it sai