Re: apt question revisitted

2001-07-04 Thread der.hans
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte D-Man so: > I used 'dist-upgrade', not 'install apt', a couple weeks ago. I got > the same sort of errors. I tried the '-f' (force) option (as suggested Actually, -f is --fix-broken. > by some program) and it worked. I then killed it so I could go back to > regular u

Re: apt question revisitted

2001-07-04 Thread der.hans
Am 03. Jul, 2001 schwäzte Paul Mackinney so: > Disclaimer: Post from blatant newbie. > > I tried der.hans' advice to add the two lines to /etc/apt/sources.list for > woody (these exactly match the woody page on www.debian.org, BTW) > > > deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib no

Re: apt question revisitted

2001-07-03 Thread D-Man
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 02:54:02PM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote: | Disclaimer: Post from blatant newbie. | | I tried der.hans' advice to add the two lines to /etc/apt/sources.list | for woody (these exactly match the woody page on www.debian.org, BTW) | Unpacking g++-2.95 (from .../g++-2.95_1%3a2.