On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:09:26PM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> squid cache server is easier for me to set up.
Then use it ;-) If you've already got Squid set up nicely, then obviously
it is less effort to point Apt at Squid than to install apt-proxy.
apt-proxy is quite different to Squid, because
Hi Ross
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:25:52PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> I am trying to use apt-proxy at home so that I can share debs between my
> desktop and laptop. However, when I run "dselect update" with my
> sources.list pointing at the proxy (which points at the UK mirrors), I
> get a list
FYI:
squid cache server is easier for me to set up.
More generic and no need to reconfigure even if you fetch from other
sources.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:25:52PM +0100, Ross Burton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use apt-proxy at home so that I can share debs between my
> desktop and laptop
3 matches
Mail list logo
