Re: apt-get upgrade message in sid

2011-02-14 Thread David Kalnischkies
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:57, Keshwarsingh Nadan wrote: > "Lets assume you want to install iceweasel version whatever from > experimental or backports" > > If we wanted to install a testing version of a program (for example), we > would have to override the choices we make when we use apt-get, e.

Re: apt-get upgrade message in sid

2011-02-14 Thread Keshwarsingh Nadan
Hi, "Lets assume you want to install iceweasel version whatever from experimental or backports" apt-cache policy iceweasel If we wanted to install a testing version of a program (for example), we would have to override the choices we make when we use apt-get, e.g. apt-get install [packagename]

Re: apt-get upgrade message in sid

2011-02-14 Thread David Kalnischkies
Hi debian-user :) > What is David Kalnischkies telling me here? "He" tries to tell you that apt-get will try a minimal release override for you according to the dependencies in the request. Lets assume you want to install iceweasel version whatever from experimental or backports. This includes n

Re: apt-get upgrade message in sid

2011-02-13 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2011-02-13 05:08 +0100, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <8roudpfga...@mid.individual.net>, Charles Kroeger wrote: >>apt (0.8.11) unstable; urgency=low >> >> * apt-get install pkg/experimental will now not only switch the >>candidate of package pkg to the version from the release >>e

Re: apt-get upgrade message in sid

2011-02-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <8roudpfga...@mid.individual.net>, Charles Kroeger wrote: >apt (0.8.11) unstable; urgency=low > > * apt-get install pkg/experimental will now not only switch the >candidate of package pkg to the version from the release >experimental but also of all dependencies of pkg if the current >