Thus spake Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I think that the -t flag works for getting source as well. Have a
> > look at the man page.
>
> It didn't. I tried that and thought I mentioned it in my email ...
> that bit seems to have been omitted. My bad.
Ah, yeah, didn't see that ment
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 01:13:50AM -0500, Justin R. Miller wrote:
> Thus spake Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > $ apt-get source php4/testing
> >
> > should work, but doesn't. It says "unable to find a source package
> > for php4/testing" ...
> >
> > I'm looking at the pool directory
This is cool!
Back to apt-cache, can I specify a release name and query the version
number of a specific package?
like apt-cache -t stable show php4
But seems apt-cache does not provide -t.
> Thus spake Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > $ apt-get source php4/testing
> >
> > should
Thus spake Nathan E Norman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> $ apt-get source php4/testing
>
> should work, but doesn't. It says "unable to find a source package
> for php4/testing" ...
>
> I'm looking at the pool directory and the source for 4.0.100 (the
> version in testing) is there ... so you could a
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 11:32:26AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've defined stable,testing and unstable URLs in my sources.list file.
> After apt-get update, seems apt-get will only deal with the latest version
> of packages or sources. Is there any way to specify a specific
> tree(s
on Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:55:17AM -0700, Tristan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> When using apt-get upgrade, apt-get wants to upgrade packages I built from
> apt-get -b source even though the package's
> version is current. Is there a way of stopping apt-get from doing this?
Have you marked your lo
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:27:16 +, Colin Watson said:
>>dpkg-source -x licq_1.0-5.dsc
>
>This was a problem because it complained that the dsc file was not a
>gzipped file and I gzipped it. Then it complained that the file was
>not the size expected. I down
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 21:27:16 +, Colin Watson said:
> Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am having problems getting the latest sources for Licq.
> >I can download the dsc diff, and tarball for version 1.0 manually
> >from ftp.debian.org but when I try to get them with 'apt-get source
Pollywog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am having problems getting the latest sources for Licq.
>I can download the dsc diff, and tarball for version 1.0 manually
>from ftp.debian.org but when I try to get them with 'apt-get source
>licq', I get an older version even though my sources.list is set up
9 matches
Mail list logo