On 11/25/99 02:15PM, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> You will probably have to do apt-get install after that. Just bare, it
> happened to me
> yesterday, and I did apt-get install by pure chance. It worked then. It
> shouldn't
> happen, I agree, lets hope it will be fixed. Please report if this works
You will probably have to do apt-get install after that. Just bare, it happened
to me
yesterday, and I did apt-get install by pure chance. It worked then. It
shouldn't
happen, I agree, lets hope it will be fixed. Please report if this works back
to the
list
Mark Wagnon wrote:
> On 11/25/99 12:
On 11/25/99 11:32AM, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> If a package is held back, I usually will do an apt-get install for it
> individually.
> Have you tried just doing an apt-get install mutt?
>
I'll try that and see what happens...
thanks
--
__ _
Mark Wagnon
On 11/25/99 12:18AM, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> did you try apt-get dist-upgrade? or just apt-get upgrade?
>
Right after I installed slink from cd-roms I edited my sources.list
file and ran apt-get update/dist-upgrade. I ran apt-get update/upgrade
last night to bring my installatio up to snuff.
>
> I recently upgraded to potato, and just noticed thant I'm still using
> the .95 version of mutt (potato has the 1.0 v.). I did and apt-get
> update/upgrade and a bunch of packages are being held back. Is there a
> way to get them to install via apt-get?
If a package is held back, I usually will d
On 25/11/99 Mark Wagnon wrote:
I recently upgraded to potato, and just noticed thant I'm still using
the .95 version of mutt (potato has the 1.0 v.). I did and apt-get
update/upgrade and a bunch of packages are being held back. Is there a
way to get them to install via apt-get?
did you try apt
6 matches
Mail list logo