mike polniak wrote:
> When will we see apt 0.4?
Sometime before the heat-death of the universe.
--
see shy jo
Joey Hess wrote:
> James Lindenschmidt wrote:
> > My question is, could we put a flag in apt-get that specifies whether we
> > want
> > stable or unstable? Something like this: apt-get install unstable foo?
>
> You mean "apt-get install foo=unstable". It's already in apt 0.4.
Wh
James Lindenschmidt wrote:
> My question is, could we put a flag in apt-get that specifies whether we want
> stable or unstable? Something like this: apt-get install unstable foo?
You mean "apt-get install foo=unstable". It's already in apt 0.4.
--
see shy jo
Quoth David B. Harris,
> Since it's generally very unsafe to install testing/unstable binaries on
> a Potato system(or mixing binaries of any of the distributions, for that
> matter), I'd like to amend this suggestion to the following:
>
> 'apt-get install unstable foo'
>
> Compiles package (the
To quote James Lindenschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# My question is, could we put a flag in apt-get that specifies whether
we want
# stable or unstable? Something like this: apt-get install unstable foo?
Since it's generally very unsafe to install testing/unstable binaries on
a Potato system(or mi
5 matches
Mail list logo