On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:54:18PM +0800, Gero Putzar
was heard to say:
> So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
> installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
> for the following dependency".
That message just lists the depend
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 19:54:18, Gero Putzar wrote:
>
> I tried to install the package "shutter" from testing on my stable distro. I
> included the testing repositories in the apt-sources list and set
> APT::Default-Release "lenny";
Be careful with that, due to a long-standing bug in apt codenames are
On 2009-09-05 06:54, Gero Putzar wrote:
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native spea
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native speaker. So maybe I should not complain about
On 2009-09-04 23:03, Gero Putzar wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error message from apt-get:
---snip---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
installed
Breaks: lib32gcc1 (<= 1:4.4.0-6) but 1:4.3.2-1.1
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:03:37PM +0800, Gero Putzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error message from apt-get:
>
> ---snip---
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
> installed
> Breaks: lib3
6 matches
Mail list logo
