On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 07:54:18PM +0800, Gero Putzar
was heard to say:
> So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
> installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
> for the following dependency".
That message just lists the depend
On Sat,05.Sep.09, 19:54:18, Gero Putzar wrote:
>
> I tried to install the package "shutter" from testing on my stable distro. I
> included the testing repositories in the apt-sources list and set
> APT::Default-Release "lenny";
Be careful with that, due to a long-standing bug in apt codenames are
On 2009-09-05 06:54, Gero Putzar wrote:
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native spea
Thank you very much for your help!
@ Brian:
So "A: Breaks: B" is meant to read as "A would break B if it was going to be
installed". I interpreted the "Breaks:" as "does not comply with the need
for the following dependency".
Well, I'm not a native speaker. So maybe I should not complain about
On 2009-09-04 23:03, Gero Putzar wrote:
Hi,
I get the following error message from apt-get:
---snip---
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
installed
Breaks: lib32gcc1 (<= 1:4.4.0-6) but 1:4.3.2-1.1
On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 12:03:37PM +0800, Gero Putzar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I get the following error message from apt-get:
>
> ---snip---
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libc6-i386: Breaks: lib32asound2 (<= 1.0.20-2) but 1.0.16-2 is to be
> installed
> Breaks: lib3
On 6 Jun 2003 Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
>> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
>> > message:
>> >
>> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
>> >
On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> message:
>
> Retrieving bug reports... Done
> dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (most recent
> call last):
> File "/usr/bin/apt-listchang
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 13:05, Ben Kal wrote:
> On 4 Jun 2003 Rick Pasotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > When I 'apt-get install' a package I have been getting the following error
> > message:
> >
> > Retrieving bug reports... Done
> > dpkg-deb: wait for tar failed: No child processes Traceback (
Extracted from: http://katspace.net/computers/linux_tips.txt
"This happened because Debian is so big now, that once I started listing
multiple sources, it couldn't cope with them all with its default
settings for its Dynamic MMap (which stands for Dynamic Memory Map I
think). The way this gets fix
10 matches
Mail list logo
