On Du, 13 apr 14, 17:24:07, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Sven Joachim wrote:
> >
> > You could use aptitude to mark the dependencies as auto-installed
> > (untested):
> >
> > # aptitude markauto "~Dlibreoffice"
> >
> > Then you can autoremove them as you wish.
Shouldn't that be
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2014-04-13 05:59 +0200, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
> >> Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>
> [snip]
> >>
> >> Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
> >
> > I rechecked,
On 2014-04-13 05:59 +0200, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
>> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>
>> Hello Patrick,
>>
>> >uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
>> >libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests,
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:59:02 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> >I rechecked, and the metapackage is removed, but not any of
> >libreoffice modules. Ultimately, I just purged each of the modules
> >by name, then autoremove the orphaned dependencies.
> >
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 23:21:55 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> I don't use GNOME, so I'll leave that to you. :)
> GNOME is one of the reasons I use a Window Manager. :)
Nah, I'll pass. Stopped using GNOME back in 2007, never looked back
since then.
Reco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 10:50:03AM +0400, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:18:01 +1200
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> > > paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> > > i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:59:02 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>I rechecked, and the metapackage is removed, but not any of libreoffice
>modules. Ultimately, I just purged each of the modules by name, then
>autoremove the orphaned dependencies.
>
>There should be an easier way.
Maybe,
Hi.
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014 16:18:01 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> > paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> > i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>= 2.8)
>
> WTF. Shouldn't that be a recommends?
>
> Seems like a bug
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 12:26:10AM -0400, PaulNM wrote:
> paul@debguis2:~$ aptitude why libreoffice-writer
> i gnome Depends libreoffice-writer | abiword (>= 2.8)
WTF. Shouldn't that be a recommends?
Seems like a bug to me.
--
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the pe
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
> Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Hello Patrick,
>
> >uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
> >libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests, and as far as I can tell
> >little or nothing is removed.
>
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
>
> On 04/11/2014 09:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> [snip]
> > Fine. Everything is installed. Now, sometime later, I want to
> > uninstall or purge libreoffice from
Try removing libreoffice-core .
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/877g6ud7y9@thumper.dhh.gt.org
On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 06:15:54 +0100
Brad Rogers wrote:
Hello Brad,
>Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
No. I didn't read the follow ups. Already dealt with.
Move along: Nothing to see here. :-)
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious is
/ _)rad
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:28:04 -0700
Patrick Bartek wrote:
Hello Patrick,
>uninstall or purge libreoffice from the system. 'apt-get purge
>libreoffice' won't do it. I've done tests, and as far as I can tell
>little or nothing is removed.
Not even the meta-package 'libreoffice'?
--
Regards _
On 04/11/2014 09:28 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
>
>> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>>>
>>> Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
>>> uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there
>>> is and I jus
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, John Hasler wrote:
> Patrick Bartek writes:
> > Now, sometime later, I want to uninstall or purge libreoffice from
> > the system. 'apt-get purge libreoffice' won't do it.
>
> Try 'apt-get purge libreoffice && apt-get autoremove'
Already tried. Since the first action doesn'
Patrick Bartek writes:
> Now, sometime later, I want to uninstall or purge libreoffice from the
> system. 'apt-get purge libreoffice' won't do it.
Try 'apt-get purge libreoffice && apt-get autoremove'
--
John Hasler
jhas...@newsguy.com
Elmwood, WI USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-r
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, PaulNM wrote:
> On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >
> > Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
> > uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there
> > is and I just haven't found it. ;-)
> >
>
> apt-get autoremov
On 04/10/2014 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Dist-upgrade installs the NEWER version of a file(s) and its
> dependencies, and removes the OLD version. That is, v1.0 to v2.0.
> Upgrade does v1.0 to v1.1 as well a security and bug fixes. Check the
> versions of what was going to be insta
[Please trim your quotes to just include relevant content, makes it
easier to read.]
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 09:04:21PM -0700, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> After it went
> Stable, I used just upgrade -- for the most part. So there would be no
> major changes. This also recommended by Debian.
Stable m
On 04/11/2014 12:04 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
>
> Now, if "they" could come up with an efficient and effective way to
> uninstall/purge stuff installed via a metapackage. Or maybe there is
> and I just haven't found it. ;-)
>
apt-get autoremove
> B
>
>
- PaulNM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 10/04/14 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >>>
> Had a strange problem this morning for the s
On 10/04/14 04:56 PM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Re
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> >
> >> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
> >>
> >>
> >> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> >> Reading package lis
On 10/04/14 12:07 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2014 16:17:21 Robin wrote:
Synaptic, I think, defaults to Smart Upgrade, the equivalent is
apt-get dist-upgrade.
Man apt-get for the full details
You probably ran
# aptitude upgrade
too. That doesn't remove anything.
# aptitude ful
On 10/04/14 11:50 AM, Patrick Bartek wrote:
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calc
On 10/04/14 11:17 AM, Robin wrote:
On 10 April 2014 16:07, Frank McCormick wrote:
Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculatin
On Thursday 10 April 2014 16:17:21 Robin wrote:
> Synaptic, I think, defaults to Smart Upgrade, the equivalent is
> apt-get dist-upgrade.
> Man apt-get for the full details
You probably ran
# aptitude upgrade
too. That doesn't remove anything.
# aptitude full-upgrade
would have accomplished
On Thu, 10 Apr 2014, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
>
>
> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The f
On 10 April 2014 16:07, Frank McCormick wrote:
> Had a strange problem this morning for the second time recently:
>
>
> root@frank-debian:/home/frank# apt-get upgrade
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The
30 matches
Mail list logo
