Federico Grau wrote:
> - I am disturbed that it does not tell me the package names before performing
>the upgrade (if I recall correctly, normal "apt-get upgrade"s do)?!
that one i can't answer it'd be nice if it did! i get the same ..
>
> - What is the significance of "communicator being
Ok folks, thanks for your help so far. Next questions,
1) I added ( deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main ) to my
sources.list file... I briefly checked (re-ran apt-setup) to see if I could
use my local mirror (tux.org) for the security updates... but it appears this
section is not
Federico Grau wrote:
>
> Actually ... no :-( ... I commented that line out because I did not know what
> it did and could see no mention of it in the man page (sources.list 5).
>
> Why would security updates need a seperate sources line? Shouldn't they
> simply be considered part of the distribu
Actually ... no :-( ... I commented that line out because I did not know what
it did and could see no mention of it in the man page (sources.list 5).
Why would security updates need a seperate sources line? Shouldn't they
simply be considered part of the distribution?
thanks for your time,
donf
Federico Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello people,
>
> I am a relatively new debian user (a couple months), but long time
> linux user. I am curious why the new glibc updates are not showing
> up when I run apt-get.
Wild guess: you *do* have
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/u
Do you have a line in /etc/apt/sources.list like:
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates main contrib non-free
or
deb http://security.debian.org slink updates
?
See http://www.debian.org/security/
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:33:17AM -0400, Federico Grau wrote:
> Hello people,
6 matches
Mail list logo
