Re: apt-get/aptitude. Ist it true...

2011-01-27 Thread Joey Hess
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > On Monday 24 January 2011 19:59:51 peter_someone wrote: > > ...that since lenny it's safe to mix the two because a. apt-get now > > handles (or can handle)orphans similarly thanks to autoremove and also > > uses the same database or better yet, has the same markings

Re: apt-get/aptitude. Ist it true...

2011-01-25 Thread Freeman
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:21:41PM -0800, evenso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:30:40AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > . . . > > > > I use aptitude (which will grow a GTK interface in Squeeze) for all my > > package > > management, but I'm glad to see APT get more featureful. It

Re: apt-get/aptitude. Ist it true...

2011-01-25 Thread Freeman
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 03:30:40AM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: . . . > > I use aptitude (which will grow a GTK interface in Squeeze) for all my > package > management, but I'm glad to see APT get more featureful. It's also nice to > see Aptitude work more seamlessly with APT. > . .

Re: apt-get/aptitude. Ist it true...

2011-01-25 Thread peter_someone
Am 2011-01-25 10:30, schrieb Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.: On Monday 24 January 2011 19:59:51 peter_someone wrote: ...that since lenny it's safe to mix the two because a. apt-get now handles (or can handle)orphans similarly thanks to autoremove and also uses the same database or better yet, has the sa

Re: apt-get/aptitude. Ist it true...

2011-01-25 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Monday 24 January 2011 19:59:51 peter_someone wrote: > ...that since lenny it's safe to mix the two because a. apt-get now > handles (or can handle)orphans similarly thanks to autoremove and also > uses the same database or better yet, has the same markings for > automatically installed vs manua