> > Boy, that many files I would prefer writing a shell
> script
> > or two, that is, if there is any consistency at all in
> the
> > filenames / current orginization. Maybe I'd organize
> > really old files by date stamp. There are a number of
> > possible options here, but I wouldn't be incline
On Thursday 13 March 2003 23:28, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.13.2142 +0100]:
> > Give Filerunner a look-see. I use it when I'm doing reorganizing like
> > you describe. I has a two-pane view, mouse driven, supports FTP,
> > flexible config, etc.
>
> inte
also sprach Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.0517 +0100]:
> I've been using Endeavour2 for a couple months now and really liking
> it. I forgot to check this the first time I saw your message. You
> can filter the dotfiles, that is if I understand correctly what you
> mean by that...files tha
also sprach Jack Pistachio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.14.0646 +0100]:
> Boy, that many files I would prefer writing a shell script
> or two, that is, if there is any consistency at all in the
> filenames / current orginization. Maybe I'd organize
> really old files by date stamp. There are a nu
Boy, that many files I would prefer writing a shell script
or two, that is, if there is any consistency at all in the
filenames / current orginization. Maybe I'd organize
really old files by date stamp. There are a number of
possible options here, but I wouldn't be inclined to
mousing around for
martin f krafft, 2003-Mar-13 20:18 +0100:
>
> there's endeavour2. it's nice. But until it can put a filter on
> files and weed out dotfiles and links out of the display, it's
> hardly usable.
>
I've been using Endeavour2 for a couple months now and really liking
it. I forgot to check this the f
> i have a tree of all the documents i ever touched in the last 14
> years, and i would like to reorganise it. there are 120,000 files
> and thus i am reverting to a GUI approach; on the shell, my fingers
> would fall off, mc is nice but a little archaic to use i find, so
> i want a mouse-driven pr
Bob Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Speaking of replying, I use Mozilla-Mail. Is there a way to have it
> default to replying only to the list, and not all recipients?
Upgrade to a mail client that supports the Mail-Followup-To: header.
That way, when you respond to a mailing list post which
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bob Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.13.2218 +0100]:
xftree?
is that packaged for Debian?
wajig install xfce
You can run xftree without starting the rest of the pieces.
also, please don't CC me, as I request in my footer. no biggie though.
Sorry,
also sprach Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.13.2142 +0100]:
> Give Filerunner a look-see. I use it when I'm doing reorganizing like
> you describe. I has a two-pane view, mouse driven, supports FTP,
> flexible config, etc.
interesting, but i am missing two things:
- drag and drop
- hotkey
also sprach Bob Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.03.13.2218 +0100]:
> xftree?
is that packaged for Debian?
also, please don't CC me, as I request in my footer. no biggie though.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :
martin f krafft wrote:
i have a tree of all the documents i ever touched in the last 14
years, and i would like to reorganise it. there are 120,000 files
and thus i am reverting to a GUI approach; on the shell, my fingers
would fall off, mc is nice but a little archaic to use i find, so
i want a m
martin f krafft, 2003-Mar-13 20:18 +0100:
> i have a tree of all the documents i ever touched in the last 14
> years, and i would like to reorganise it. there are 120,000 files
> and thus i am reverting to a GUI approach; on the shell, my fingers
> would fall off, mc is nice but a little archaic to
13 matches
Mail list logo
