Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread dg
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Hi all, Hi Eugene! > Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption > from Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> report. > > [... snipping this report ...] > > Sincerly

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Lee Bradshaw
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Sincerly speaking I have now idea how cricual is this, but as far as > I consider K6 as a choice for upgrating my PC, I would like to know how > reliable is this assuming that I have no intention to run this testing > program very o

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Christian Zander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 02 Jun 1998, Nils Rennebarth wrote: >>On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: >> Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption >> from Andreas Ha

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption > from Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> report. > > # OSCPU result > ==