Re: __STDC__

2000-07-10 Thread Ian Zimmerman
Note I've sent a carbon to the list as I think this is still relevant. itz> Hmmm. I have actually solved the compilation problem, and it was itz> unrelated; in other words, __STDC__ _is_ defined during normal itz> compiles. Any gcc guru here to explain why it doesn't show in itz> the output of

Re: __STDC__

2000-07-10 Thread Ian Zimmerman
> kronstadt:/usr/include$ gcc -E -dM -xc /dev/null > #define __linux__ 1 > #define linux 1 > #define __i386__ 1 > #define __i386 1 > #define __GNUC_MINOR__ 95 > #define i386 1 > #define __unix 1 > #define __unix__ 1 > #define __GNUC__ 2 > #define __linux 1 > #define __ELF__ 1 > #define

Re: __STDC__

2000-07-10 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 09:00:55PM -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote: > kronstadt:/usr/include$ gcc -E -dM -xc /dev/null > #define __linux__ 1 > #define linux 1 > #define __i386__ 1 > #define __i386 1 > #define __GNUC_MINOR__ 95 > #define i386 1 > #define __unix 1 > #define __unix__ 1 > #define _