Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-20 Thread Dan Hitt
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 9:08 PM Joel Rees wrote: > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > > Issues? > > Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories? > Hi Joel, So as it happe

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-20 Thread Nazar Zhuk
On 2020-03-19 18:39, Anil Felipe Duggirala wrote: I have installed the flatpak with the latest version. I am running Debian 10 and Gnome. When trying to share the screen a message comes up saying that screen sharing is only available in Gnome on Wayland on Debian 9+,, and screen sharing does not

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-19 Thread Anil Felipe Duggirala
Hello Nazar, I have installed the flatpak with the latest version. I am running Debian 10 and Gnome. When trying to share the screen a message comes up saying that screen sharing is only available in Gnome on Wayland on Debian 9+,, and screen sharing does not start. I am baffled by this. Did you in

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-15 Thread Andrew J. Caines
On 3/1/20 12:08 AM, Joel Rees wrote: Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us Issues? Screen and window sharing don't work with Wayland (yet?), requiring a switch to Xorg. I only experienced this on Fedora using the Flatpak, but presume it's not specific to the platform. Shari

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-02 Thread Nazar Zhuk
On 2020-02-29 23:08, Joel Rees wrote: (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users lists.) Questions about zoom --www.zoom.us Anyone using it? Issues? Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories? As others have pointed out, it's proprietary and wil

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Ralph Katz
On 2/29/20 10:08 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > > Issues? > > Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories? zoom is propri

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 12:46:24PM -0500, Henning Follmann wrote: On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 02:08:27PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: If you are interested in a free video/ voice conference tool look at jitsi. Jitsi (or perhaps it is "jitsi-meet" has a free web-accessible service which does not require

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Henning Follmann
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 02:08:27PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > Maybe, not me tho > Issues? It's proprietary > > Known reasons they don't put it in the

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 10:15:45 -0700 Charles Curley wrote: > Rather than install Chrome, consider installing chromium. I believe it > is the open source base of Chromium. Sorry. I believe chromium is the open source base of Chrome. -- Does anybody read signatures any more? https://charlescurley.

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 03:44:27 +1100 David wrote: > If anyone can advise me how to make this version of Firefox work > on current Debian buster or stretch, I will be grateful to be > corrected. I've had to reluctantly install the Zoom client, > preferring that compromise to installing Chrome. Rathe

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread David
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 23:41, Dan Ritter wrote: > If someone sends you a link to use their service, they have a semi-hidden > web client available -- take the conference identifier from the regular > URL, and append it to > > https://zoom.us/wc/join/ > > This works in Firefox and Chromium. My ex

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 08:07:58AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, March 01, 2020 07:41:18 AM Dan Ritter wrote: > > If someone sends you a link to use their service, they have a semi-hidden > > web client available -- > > I guess that should be web server? > > I mean, unless this

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Dan Ritter
rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, March 01, 2020 07:41:18 AM Dan Ritter wrote: > > If someone sends you a link to use their service, they have a semi-hidden > > web client available -- > > I guess that should be web server? > > I mean, unless this is like the backwards (to me, and I'm fam

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread rhkramer
On Sunday, March 01, 2020 07:41:18 AM Dan Ritter wrote: > If someone sends you a link to use their service, they have a semi-hidden > web client available -- I guess that should be web server? I mean, unless this is like the backwards (to me, and I'm familiar with the justification / arguments

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Dan Ritter
Joel Rees wrote: > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > > Issues? > > Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories? It's not free in any sense. If someone sends you a lin

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
[ replying only where I am subscribed ] Quoting Joel Rees (2020-03-01 06:08:27) > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > > Issues? > > Known reasons they don't put it in the general reposit

Re: Zoom conferencing

2020-03-01 Thread tomas
On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 02:08:27PM +0900, Joel Rees wrote: > (I hope no one gets upset about double posting debian and ubuntu users > lists.) > > Questions about zoom -- www.zoom.us > > Anyone using it? > > Issues? > > Known reasons they don't put it in the general repositories? Perhaps becaus